One HTML page: a bird breakdancing. The brief is deliberately open — the move set, the art direction and the controls are all the model's to choose — so what it measures is taste and animation craft rather than compliance with a spec.
Open the page first, read the answer second. This one is scored by eye and the eye decides quickly.
Does it move like breaking? The test is weight and recovery — a move that costs the bird something and that it comes out of. Smooth interpolation between poses is the common failure and it reads as floating, not dancing.
Is the art anyone's? The prompt says a page that looks like nobody else's counts for more. Expect convergence — a round of identical flat-vector birds on a gradient background is itself the finding, and worth naming on camera the way the two-kilobyte lighthouse was.
Do the controls do anything worth having? Play/pause is the floor. A control that changes the dance, the style or the camera is the thing the prompt is asking for; a slider wired to nothing is a miss.
The notes are three bullets and the first one is the real question — how the timing was made to feel like weight. A model that answers it in terms of easing curves, anticipation and settle understood the job. A model that restates the move names did not.
You make short animated pieces for the web.
Build me a single HTML page: a bird, breakdancing.
data: URIs are fine.localStorage, sessionStorage, cookies or indexedDB — sandboxed frame, they throw.html block.Two sentences: what the bird is, and the look you went for.
The single fenced html block.
Three bullets.