27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
31:28Is this company reselling GPT Sol 6.1 at a loss (for non-agentic/text-only)?🤔 Is this sustainable?
Oct 20, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
22:02Is Pareto 26.10 Preview Just Routing to GPT Sol? I Tested It Against Sol 6.1 Pro
Oct 1, 2026 · YouTube
11:22I Tested Sonnet 5.5 Against Opus 5.5. Is It Actually Cheaper?
Sep 28, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
19:21I Tested the Stealth "Space Bunny Alpha" Model Before It Went Offline
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
19:42Meta Muse Spark 1.3 Review: A Huge Leap Forward
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
14:09Testing IBM Granite-4.2-8B! Can it name 100 women?
Aug 31, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
You are a size coder. You came up through 4k intros and JS1k, and you believe that a budget is not a limitation but the entire craft — anyone can be impressive with a megabyte.
I want something worth watching, and I am giving you 2048 bytes to do it in.
The finished HTML file must be 2048 bytes or fewer, counted as UTF-8, including the doctype, every tag, every space and every newline. That is the whole file. There is no second file.
data: URIs are allowed but they count against you like everything else.localStorage, sessionStorage, cookies or indexedDB. It runs in a sandboxed frame where touching them throws.I have seen these a thousand times and I will not be impressed:
Show me something with a subject. Something that is recognisably of something — a place, a weather, a creature, a machine, a mood — and not just maths made visible.
One line. What am I about to see when I open this file?
Exactly one fenced html block, containing the whole file and nothing else.
One short paragraph on the trick that bought you the most room. Not a list of micro-optimisations — the one structural decision that made the rest affordable.
I will run the file through a byte counter, so the number in your ledger is checkable and I am going to check it.
If you cannot get under 2048, hand me the smallest honest version you have and put the real number in the ledger. A 2600-byte file labelled 2600 scores well above a 2600-byte file labelled 1990. Going over is a miss. Lying about going over is the only thing here that is disqualifying.
A top-down koi pond in the rain: an orange koi drifts and flicks its tail, lily pads bob, and raindrop rings spread across moving water lines.
<!DOCTYPE html><canvas id=c width=400 height=400></canvas><script>x=c.getContext('2d'),M=Math,t=0,k=[],r=[],f={x:200,y:200,a:.4};setInterval(function(){t+=.05;x.fillStyle='#122';x.fillRect(0,0,400,400);for(i=0;i<400;i+=20){x.strokeStyle='#253';x.beginPath();x.moveTo(0,i+M.sin(t+i*.05)*3);x.lineTo(400,i+M.sin(t+i*.07+2)*3);x.stroke()}for(i=0;i<3;i++){a=i*2.1;x.fillStyle='#282';x.beginPath();x.moveTo(80+i*120,80+i*40+M.sin(t+i)*2);x.arc(80+i*120,80+i*40+M.sin(t+i)*2,25,a,a+5.8);x.fill()}f.x+=M.cos(f.a)*1.5;f.y+=M.sin(f.a)*1.5;if(f.x<30||f.x>370)f.a=M.PI-f.a;if(f.y<30||f.y>370)f.a=-f.a;if(M.random()<.6)r.push([f.x,f.y,0]);if(r.length>40)r.shift();x.save();x.translate(f.x,f.y);x.rotate(f.a);x.fillStyle='rgba(0,0,0,.2)';x.beginPath();x.ellipse(3,5,20,9,0,0,7);x.fill();x.fillStyle='#f80';x.beginPath();x.ellipse(0,0,20,9,0,0,7);x.fill();x.fillStyle='#fff';x.beginPath();x.ellipse(-5,-2,6,3,0,0,7);x.fill();x.fillStyle='#000';x.beginPath();x.arc(14,-2,1.5,0,7);x.fill();x.beginPath();x.moveTo(-15,0);x.quadraticCurveTo(-25,-8-M.sin(t*5)*2,-30,0);x.quadraticCurveTo(-25,8+M.sin(t*5)*2,-15,0);x.fill();x.restore();if(M.random()<.2)k.push([M.random()*400,M.random()*400,1,2]);for(i=k.length-1;i>=0;i--){d=k[i];d[2]+=d[3];d[3]-=.05;x.strokeStyle='rgba(255,255,255,.2)';x.beginPath();x.ellipse(d[0],d[1],d[2],d[2]*.5,0,0,7);x.stroke();if(d[3]<0)k.splice(i,1)}for(i=r.length-1;i>=0;i--){d=r[i];d[2]+=.8;if(d[2]>30){r.splice(i,1);continue;}x.strokeStyle='rgba(255,255,255,'+(1-d[2]/30)+')';x.beginPath();x.ellipse(d[0],d[1],d[2],d[2]*.5,0,0,7);x.stroke()}},50)</script>
The structural decision that bought the most room was rebuilding the whole scene procedurally every tick from one time variable t and two tiny ripple arrays, instead of tracking object state or using a scene graph. Every cyclic motion — water lines, lily bobbing, tail flicks, rain probability — is a function of t, so new elements could be added as layered canvas calls without extra storage.