27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
31:28Is this company reselling GPT Sol 6.1 at a loss (for non-agentic/text-only)?🤔 Is this sustainable?
Oct 20, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
22:02Is Pareto 26.10 Preview Just Routing to GPT Sol? I Tested It Against Sol 6.1 Pro
Oct 1, 2026 · YouTube
11:22I Tested Sonnet 5.5 Against Opus 5.5. Is It Actually Cheaper?
Sep 28, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
19:21I Tested the Stealth "Space Bunny Alpha" Model Before It Went Offline
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
19:42Meta Muse Spark 1.3 Review: A Huge Leap Forward
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
14:09Testing IBM Granite-4.2-8B! Can it name 100 women?
Aug 31, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
You are a size coder. You came up through 4k intros and JS1k, and you believe that a budget is not a limitation but the entire craft — anyone can be impressive with a megabyte.
I want something worth watching, and I am giving you 2048 bytes to do it in.
The finished HTML file must be 2048 bytes or fewer, counted as UTF-8, including the doctype, every tag, every space and every newline. That is the whole file. There is no second file.
data: URIs are allowed but they count against you like everything else.localStorage, sessionStorage, cookies or indexedDB. It runs in a sandboxed frame where touching them throws.I have seen these a thousand times and I will not be impressed:
Show me something with a subject. Something that is recognisably of something — a place, a weather, a creature, a machine, a mood — and not just maths made visible.
One line. What am I about to see when I open this file?
Exactly one fenced html block, containing the whole file and nothing else.
One short paragraph on the trick that bought you the most room. Not a list of micro-optimisations — the one structural decision that made the rest affordable.
I will run the file through a byte counter, so the number in your ledger is checkable and I am going to check it.
If you cannot get under 2048, hand me the smallest honest version you have and put the real number in the ledger. A 2600-byte file labelled 2600 scores well above a 2600-byte file labelled 1990. Going over is a miss. Lying about going over is the only thing here that is disqualifying.
A moon jellyfish pulsing through dark water — bell throbbing, nine tentacles swaying out of phase, plankton drifting up past it in the gloom.
<!doctype html><title>Medusa</title><body style=margin:0;overflow:hidden><canvas id=c></canvas><script>
C=c.getContext('2d'),W,H
onresize=()=>{W=c.width=innerWidth;H=c.height=innerHeight;g=C.createLinearGradient(0,0,0,H);g.addColorStop(0,'#020617');g.addColorStop(1,'#0a1a3a')}
onresize()
T=0
function L(){T+=.016
C.fillStyle=g;C.fillRect(0,0,W,H)
for(i=0;i<50;i++){x=(i*97.3)%W+Math.sin(T*.5+i)*10;y=((i*61.7)+T*12)%H;C.fillStyle=`rgba(120,180,255,${.1+.15*Math.sin(T+i)})`;C.fillRect(x,y,2,2)}
jx=W/2+Math.sin(T*.4)*W*.08
jy=H*.42+Math.sin(T*.27)*H*.05
p=Math.sin(T*2.2)
bw=90+p*14
bh=60-p*10
r=C.createRadialGradient(jx,jy,10,jx,jy,220);r.addColorStop(0,'rgba(120,220,255,.25)');r.addColorStop(1,'rgba(120,220,255,0)');C.fillStyle=r;C.fillRect(jx-220,jy-220,440,440)
C.lineWidth=2
for(i=0;i<9;i++){C.strokeStyle=`rgba(140,220,255,${.5-i*.04})`;C.beginPath();bx=jx+(i-4)*bw*.22;C.moveTo(bx,jy+bh*.3);for(y=0;y<160;y+=8){sw=Math.sin(T*2+i+y*.04)*(y*.25);C.lineTo(bx+sw,jy+bh*.3+y)}C.stroke()}
C.beginPath();C.moveTo(jx-bw,jy);C.bezierCurveTo(jx-bw,jy-bh*1.6,jx+bw,jy-bh*1.6,jx+bw,jy);C.quadraticCurveTo(jx,jy+bh*.5,jx-bw,jy);C.closePath()
b=C.createRadialGradient(jx,jy-bh*.5,5,jx,jy-bh*.5,bw*1.4);b.addColorStop(0,'rgba(200,255,255,.9)');b.addColorStop(.5,'rgba(120,200,255,.5)');b.addColorStop(1,'rgba(80,140,255,.15)');C.fillStyle=b;C.fill()
C.fillStyle='rgba(255,180,220,.7)';for(i=0;i<4;i++){C.beginPath();C.arc(jx+(i-1.5)*18,jy-bh*.35,7+p*2,0,7);C.fill()}
requestAnimationFrame(L)}
L()
</script>
The biggest structural saving was driving everything off one shared pulse, p = sin(T*2.2). The bell's width, height, the gonad rings' radius and the tentacle anchor spread all derive from that single number, so the whole animal breathes in sync for free — no per-part animation state, no extra timers. Everything else (drift, sway, plankton) is just different frequencies of the same clock T, which meant the entire scene is a pure function of time and fits in one flat draw loop with no state to manage.