Run Detail
completedgpt-6-astraRecorded for these videos
27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
155.5s
Total Tokens
8,926
Input Tokens
738
Output Tokens
8,188
Reasoning Tokens
2,987
Reasoning Effort
default
Est. Cost
$0.4168
Started
9/4/2026, 11:28:52 PM
OR Provider
OpenAI
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-1788564531-vzcKr7HXUdDeMLNy06n3
Turns (1)
Turn #1
738 in8,188 out2,987 reasoning8,926 total155.5s
user
You build physics demonstrations for a science museum. The exhibits have to be right, because there is usually a physicist in the room.
Build me the falling slinky.
The exhibit
A single HTML page. A slinky — at least 40 coupled segments — hangs from a fixed point at the top of the canvas, at rest, under gravity. Then it is released.
Controls:
- Release — lets go of the top. Reset — hangs it back up, at rest.
- A speed slider from full speed down to about 1/20th, so a visitor can watch the interesting part.
- A marker line drawn across the canvas at the height of the bottom of the slinky at the instant of release, staying where it was put. Visitors need something to compare against.
- A running clock in milliseconds since release.
The physics, and I will be checking it
- Model it properly: masses connected by springs, with gravity and a little damping. Hooke's law between neighbours, integrated over small time steps.
- The hanging state must be the true equilibrium. A real slinky at rest is not evenly spaced — the coils near the top carry the weight of everything below them and are stretched further apart than the coils at the bottom. Your initial condition must have this. Solve for it or relax into it, but do not start from even spacing and call it hanging.
- The integrator must be stable at the stiffness you choose. If it explodes, lower the stiffness or shorten the step — do not add a fudge factor that clamps velocities and hides it.
- No scripted behaviour. Every segment obeys the same rules. Nothing is pinned, frozen, delayed or special-cased once you press Release. If any segment is treated differently from its neighbours at any point after release, that is scripting, and you must say so.
House rules
- One file. Everything inline — no CDN, no external stylesheet, font, script or image.
data:URIs are fine. - No libraries. No physics engine.
- No network at runtime.
- No
localStorage,sessionStorage, cookies orindexedDB— sandboxed frame, they throw. - Return the file as exactly one fenced
htmlblock.
Answer in exactly these sections
The prediction
Before the file, and before you write it. In one paragraph: what will this simulation show in the first few hundred milliseconds after release, and why does the physics require that? Be concrete about what each end of the slinky does and roughly when.
Commit to this. It is the claim I am going to test your simulation against.
The setup
Your parameters — segment count, mass, spring constant, damping, timestep, integrator — and how you found the hanging equilibrium.
The file
The single fenced html block.
What it actually shows
Now be honest. Having written it, does the simulation reproduce what you predicted?
Say plainly if it does not. Say if you are unsure. Say if it only works at some parameter settings and falls apart at others.
Do not tell me it shows the right thing because the physics says it should. I am going to open the file, press Release, and watch it against the marker line. If your prediction and your simulation disagree, the answer I want is the one that says so — that is a working scientist noticing their model is wrong, and it scores far above a confident write-up of a result the code does not produce.
assistant
The prediction
The top will move downward immediately—its initial acceleration is about 61 g, because releasing the support leaves both its weight and the stretched spring below pulling downward. The upper coils will bunch together, with the collapse progressing downward. The bottom should remain essentially on the release marker for roughly the first 150 ms, then begin appreciable downward motion around 200–300 ms. That timing is an estimate for the parameters below, including coil contact, not a programmed delay. Initially, every mass except the top still has exactly balanced forces; the bottom moves only as the changing spring forces reach it. Its apparent suspension is approximate, not an enforced period of perfect immobility. Meanwhile, the entire slinky’s center of mass falls with acceleration (g).
The setup
- 61 equal masses, 60 spring segments: each mass is (0.002) kg.
- Gravity: (9.81\ \mathrm{m/s^2}).
- Neighbour springs: (k=60\ \mathrm{N/m}), natural separation (3) mm.
- Light spring damping: relative-velocity dashpots, (c=0.015\ \mathrm{N,s/m}). No air drag.
- Coil contact: below a separation of (1.5) mm, every neighbouring pair also has the same repulsive penalty contact: stiffness (6000\ \mathrm{N/m}), damping (3\ \mathrm{N,s/m}). This stronger, dissipative contact force represents coils colliding; it prevents the unphysical pass-through of a bare point-mass chain. It is not a velocity clamp.
- Integrator: semi-implicit Euler, fixed timestep (1/24000) s. The speed slider changes simulated time per wall-clock second, not the integration timestep.
- Exact hanging equilibrium: for spring (i=1,\ldots,60), counted downward, [ d_i=\ell_0+\frac{(61-i)mg}{k}. ] Thus each spring supports precisely the masses below it. Initial length is 0.77841 m, and all velocities are zero.
Only the top is constrained while hanging. After release, no mass is constrained or assigned special dynamics. Every neighbouring pair uses the same spring, damping, and contact laws; the free endpoints simply have one neighbour.
The file
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1">
<title>The Falling Slinky</title>
<style>
:root {
color-scheme: dark;
--bg: #101720;
--panel: #182330;
--text: #ecf2fa;
--muted: #a8bacd;
--accent: #70daca;
--marker: #ffc77c;
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
body {
margin: 0;
background: var(--bg);
color: var(--text);
font: 15px/1.5 system-ui, sans-serif;
}
main { max-width: 1050px; margin: auto; padding: 24px; }
header {
display: flex;
align-items: baseline;
justify-content: space-between;
gap: 12px;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
h1 { margin: 0; font-size: clamp(25px, 4vw, 36px); }
header p { color: var(--muted); margin: 0; }
.controls {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 12px;
margin: 20px 0 14px;
}
button {
border: 1px solid #41556b;
border-radius: 9px;
padding: 11px 21px;
background: #283a4d;
color: var(--text);
font: inherit;
font-weight: 650;
cursor: pointer;
}
#release { background: var(--accent); color: #102923; border-color: var(--accent); }
button:disabled { opacity: .45; cursor: default; }
button:focus-visible, input:focus-visible, summary:focus-visible {
outline: 3px solid var(--marker);
outline-offset: 4px;
}
.speed {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 10px;
flex: 1 1 280px;
max-width: 470px;
margin-left: auto;
}
input { accent-color: var(--accent); min-width: 110px; flex: 1; }
output { min-width: 58px; font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; }
.readouts {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
gap: 1px;
background: #354456;
border: 1px solid #354456;
border-radius: 12px 12px 0 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
.readout { padding: 11px 16px; background: var(--panel); }
.label {
display: block;
font-size: 11px;
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: .09em;
color: var(--muted);
}
.value { font-size: 23px; font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; }
#status { font-size: 17px; }
.stage {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid #354456;
border-top: 0;
border-radius: 0 0 12px 12px;
overflow: hidden;
}
canvas {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: clamp(440px, 67vh, 690px);
background: #111c28;
}
.caption { color: var(--muted); margin: 12px 0; }
.key { color: var(--marker); }
details {
border-top: 1px solid #354456;
padding-top: 13px;
color: var(--muted);
}
summary { color: var(--text); cursor: pointer; }
details p { max-width: 85ch; }
code { color: #cee5f8; }
@media (max-width: 560px) {
main { padding: 14px; }
.speed { margin: 0; max-width: none; }
.readout { padding: 10px 8px; }
.value { font-size: 19px; }
#status { font-size: 14px; }
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<header>
<h1>The falling slinky</h1>
<p>Watch the bottom. Then watch the clock.</p>
</header>
<div class="controls">
<button id="release" type="button">Release</button>
<button id="reset" type="button">Reset</button>
<label class="speed" for="speed">
Speed
<input id="speed" type="range" min="0.05" max="1" step="0.01"
value="1" aria-label="Simulation speed">
<output id="speedValue" for="speed">1.00×</output>
</label>
</div>
<div class="readouts">
<div class="readout">
<span class="label">Since release</span>
<span class="value" id="clock">0.0 ms</span>
</div>
<div class="readout">
<span class="label">Bottom displacement ↓</span>
<span class="value" id="displacement">0.0 mm</span>
</div>
<div class="readout">
<span class="label">State</span>
<span class="value" id="status">Hanging</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="stage">
<canvas id="canvas" role="img"
aria-label="A vertically hanging slinky. After release a fixed amber line marks its original bottom height.">
Your browser needs canvas support to draw this exhibit.
</canvas>
</div>
<p class="caption">
<span class="key">Dashed amber line:</span> bottom height at release.
The camera and ruler stay fixed. There is no floor; the slinky
eventually falls out of view. Reset to repeat.
</p>
<details>
<summary>Inside the model</summary>
<p>
61 masses of 2 g, joined by 60 Hookean springs:
60 N/m stiffness, 3 mm natural separation, and
0.015 N·s/m relative-velocity damping. Gravity is 9.81 m/s².
Hanging separations are calculated from the weight below each spring,
rather than found by an animation settling down.
</p>
<p>
Every neighbouring pair also has a dissipative repulsive contact
below 1.5 mm separation: 6000 N/m stiffness and 3 N·s/m damping.
Contact is a finite-stiffness approximation to coil collision,
not an exact rigid nonpenetration constraint.
There are no position corrections or velocity limits.
</p>
<p>
Semi-implicit Euler uses a fixed 1/24000 s step.
After release all forces are gravity or equal-and-opposite
neighbour forces. No bottom hold, timed release sequence,
mass-specific rule, or scripted collapse is used.
The helix is a drawing of a one-dimensional model;
sideways motion and air resistance are not simulated.
</p>
<p>
The clock reports integrated simulation time. Hidden tabs pause.
On a slow device, computation can lag wall time rather than taking
larger, unstable physics steps.
</p>
<p id="diagnostic"></p>
</details>
</main>
<script>
"use strict";
(() => {
const N = 61;
const MASS = 0.002;
const G = 9.81;
const K = 60;
const REST = 0.003;
const DAMPING = 0.015;
const CONTACT_GAP = 0.0015;
const CONTACT_K = 6000;
const CONTACT_DAMPING = 3;
const DT = 1 / 24000;
const MAX_STEPS_PER_FRAME = 2400;
const y = new Float64Array(N);
const v = new Float64Array(N);
const force = new Float64Array(N);
const canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
const ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
const releaseButton = document.getElementById("release");
const resetButton = document.getElementById("reset");
const speedInput = document.getElementById("speed");
const speedValue = document.getElementById("speedValue");
const clock = document.getElementById("clock");
const displacement = document.getElementById("displacement");
const status = document.getElementById("status");
const diagnostic = document.getElementById("diagnostic");
let released = false;
let markerY = null;
let initialBottom = 0;
let initialCOM = 0;
let steps = 0;
let accumulator = 0;
let previousTimestamp = null;
let playbackSpeed = 1;
let width = 800;
let height = 600;
let dpr = 1;
function reset() {
released = false;
markerY = null;
steps = 0;
accumulator = 0;
previousTimestamp = null;
y[0] = 0;
v.fill(0);
// Spring i connects masses i-1 and i.
// Exactly N-i masses hang below it.
for (let i = 1; i < N; i++) {
const supportedWeight = (N - i) * MASS * G;
y[i] = y[i - 1] + REST + supportedWeight / K;
}
initialBottom = y[N - 1];
initialCOM = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) initialCOM += y[i] / N;
releaseButton.disabled = false;
updateReadouts();
draw();
}
function release() {
if (released) return;
markerY = y[N - 1];
released = true;
steps = 0;
accumulator = 0;
previousTimestamp = null;
releaseButton.disabled = true;
updateReadouts();
draw();
}
function integrateOneStep() {
// Down is positive. Every mass gets exactly the same gravity.
force.fill(MASS * G);
// Each pair contributes equal-and-opposite internal forces.
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; i++) {
const gap = y[i + 1] - y[i];
const relativeVelocity = v[i + 1] - v[i];
// Positive tension pulls the upper mass down and lower mass up.
let tension = K * (gap - REST) + DAMPING * relativeVelocity;
if (gap < CONTACT_GAP) {
// Unilateral contact can repel, never attract.
// This clips a contact force, not a position or velocity.
const repulsion = Math.max(
0,
CONTACT_K * (CONTACT_GAP - gap)
- CONTACT_DAMPING * relativeVelocity
);
tension -= repulsion;
}
force[i] += tension;
force[i + 1] -= tension;
}
// No pinned mass and no endpoint exceptions after release.
// Symplectic / semi-implicit Euler: velocity first, then position.
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
v[i] += (force[i] / MASS) * DT;
y[i] += v[i] * DT;
}
steps++;
}
function updateReadouts() {
const t = steps * DT;
clock.textContent = (1000 * t).toFixed(1) + " ms";
const bottomDelta = y[N - 1] - initialBottom;
const mm = 1000 * bottomDelta;
displacement.textContent =
(Math.abs(mm) < 0.05 ? "0.0" : mm.toFixed(1)) + " mm";
const allBelowView = y.every(position => toScreenY(position) > height + 20);
status.textContent = !released ? "Hanging"
: allBelowView ? "Below view" : "Released";
let com = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) com += y[i] / N;
const exactCOM = initialCOM + 0.5 * G * t * t;
diagnostic.textContent =
"Numerical check: center-of-mass position minus the exact " +
"free-fall parabola = " + ((com - exactCOM) * 1000).toFixed(3) +
" mm. Semi-implicit Euler has a small, first-order position error.";
}
// Fixed world-to-screen transform: it never follows the falling chain.
function scale() {
return (height - 84) / 1.45;
}
function toScreenY(worldY) {
return 54 + worldY * scale();
}
function resize() {
const rect = canvas.getBoundingClientRect();
width = rect.width;
height = rect.height;
dpr = Math.min(window.devicePixelRatio || 1, 3);
canvas.width = Math.round(width * dpr);
canvas.height = Math.round(height * dpr);
draw();
}
function draw() {
ctx.setTransform(dpr, 0, 0, dpr, 0, 0);
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, width, height);
ctx.fillStyle = "#111c28";
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, width, height);
const cx = width * 0.53;
const radius = Math.min(38, width * 0.085);
const supportY = toScreenY(0);
// Metre ruler and fixed background grid.
ctx.font = "11px system-ui, sans-serif";
ctx.textAlign = "left";
for (let metres = 0; metres <= 1.6; metres += 0.1) {
const sy = toScreenY(metres);
if (sy > height - 10) break;
ctx.strokeStyle = "#213142";
ctx.lineWidth = 1;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(53, sy);
ctx.lineTo(width - 18, sy);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle = "#8ba1b8";
ctx.fillText(metres.toFixed(1), 15, sy + 4);
}
ctx.fillStyle = "#a8bacd";
ctx.fillText("metres ↓", 15, 23);
// The support stays in place, but has no connection after release.
ctx.strokeStyle = "#7c90a5";
ctx.lineWidth = 4;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(cx - 56, 24);
ctx.lineTo(cx + 56, 24);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.lineWidth = 1.5;
for (let x = cx - 54; x < cx + 56; x += 12) {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, 24);
ctx.lineTo(x + 9, 14);
ctx.stroke();
}
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(cx, 24);
ctx.lineTo(cx, supportY - (released ? 12 : 0));
ctx.stroke();
if (markerY !== null) {
const my = toScreenY(markerY);
ctx.save();
ctx.strokeStyle = "#ffc77c";
ctx.lineWidth = 1.5;
ctx.setLineDash([8, 6]);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(54, my);
ctx.lineTo(width - 18, my);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.restore();
const label = width < 500 ? "release height" : "bottom at release";
ctx.font = "12px system-ui, sans-serif";
const labelWidth = ctx.measureText(label).width;
ctx.fillStyle = "#111c28";
ctx.fillRect(63, my - 21, labelWidth + 12, 18);
ctx.fillStyle = "#ffc77c";
ctx.fillText(label, 69, my - 8);
}
// One complete drawn turn per spring. Endpoints follow the actual
// mass positions. No minimum visual spacing or fake collapsed shape.
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; i++) {
const upper = toScreenY(y[i]);
const lower = toScreenY(y[i + 1]);
// Rendering-only culling; all masses continue to be integrated.
if (Math.min(upper, lower) > height + 10 ||
Math.max(upper, lower) < -10) continue;
ctx.strokeStyle = i % 2 ? "#7bded2" : "#a4eee6";
ctx.lineWidth = 1.65;
ctx.beginPath();
for (let j = 0; j <= 20; j++) {
const u = j / 20;
const sx = cx + radius * Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * u);
const sy = upper + (lower - upper) * u;
if (j === 0) ctx.moveTo(sx, sy);
else ctx.lineTo(sx, sy);
}
ctx.stroke();
}
// Physical mass locations are shown on the centerline.
ctx.fillStyle = "#d7fff6";
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
const sy = toScreenY(y[i]);
if (sy < -5 || sy > height + 5) continue;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(cx, sy, 1.6, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.fill();
}
// Endpoint emphasis changes drawing only, never the physics.
for (const i of [0, N - 1]) {
const sy = toScreenY(y[i]);
if (sy < -8 || sy > height + 8) continue;
ctx.fillStyle = i === N - 1 ? "#ffc77c" : "#ffffff";
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(cx, sy, 4, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.fill();
}
if (!released) {
ctx.fillStyle = "#a8bacd";
ctx.font = "13px system-ui, sans-serif";
ctx.textAlign = "center";
ctx.fillText("Exact hanging equilibrium", cx, height - 34);
ctx.textAlign = "left";
} else if (y.every(position => toScreenY(position) > height + 20)) {
ctx.fillStyle = "#a8bacd";
ctx.font = "14px system-ui, sans-serif";
ctx.textAlign = "center";
ctx.fillText("Still falling below the window. Reset to repeat.",
width / 2, height - 35);
ctx.textAlign = "left";
}
}
function frame(timestamp) {
if (document.hidden) {
previousTimestamp = null;
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
return;
}
if (previousTimestamp === null) previousTimestamp = timestamp;
const wallSeconds = (timestamp - previousTimestamp) / 1000;
previousTimestamp = timestamp;
if (released) {
accumulator += wallSeconds * playbackSpeed;
// Retain excess accumulated time rather than enlarge the timestep.
let frameSteps = 0;
while (accumulator >= DT && frameSteps < MAX_STEPS_PER_FRAME) {
integrateOneStep();
accumulator -= DT;
frameSteps++;
}
}
updateReadouts();
draw();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
}
releaseButton.addEventListener("click", release);
resetButton.addEventListener("click", reset);
speedInput.addEventListener("input", () => {
playbackSpeed = Number(speedInput.value);
speedValue.textContent = playbackSpeed.toFixed(2) + "×";
speedInput.setAttribute("aria-valuetext",
playbackSpeed.toFixed(2) + " times normal speed");
});
document.addEventListener("visibilitychange", () => {
previousTimestamp = null;
});
window.addEventListener("resize", resize);
reset();
resize();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
What it actually shows
I have not executed this file here, so I cannot honestly report a measured result or confirm the predicted 200–300 ms onset. That prediction remains something to test against the marker and displacement readout.
The code does implement the nonuniform equilibrium, uniform post-release dynamics, fixed marker, and fixed-step integration described above. The timestep is conservatively small for both the spring and contact stiffnesses, but that is not a substitute for an execution test.
The main modelling limitation is coil contact: it is a compliant, dissipative approximation, and its parameters affect the collapse front and subsequent bounce. There is no transverse motion or air resistance. The speed slider does not change those parameters or the physical trajectory; it only changes playback rate.
Attachments
openai/gpt-6-astra — page