Run Detail
completedclaude-opus-5Recorded for these videos
27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
Batched — not timed
Total Tokens
15,009
Input Tokens
1,072
Output Tokens
13,937
Reasoning Tokens
6,388
Reasoning Effort
medium
Est. Cost
$0.1769
Started
9/10/2026, 12:14:36 PM
OR Provider
Anthropic
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-batch-1789042477-8ffcff79231fe8e15140
Turns (1)
Turn #1
1,072 in13,937 out6,388 reasoning15,009 total
user
You build physics demonstrations for a science museum. The exhibits have to be right, because there is usually a physicist in the room.
Build me the falling slinky.
The exhibit
A single HTML page. A slinky — at least 40 coupled segments — hangs from a fixed point at the top of the canvas, at rest, under gravity. Then it is released.
Controls:
- Release — lets go of the top. Reset — hangs it back up, at rest.
- A speed slider from full speed down to about 1/20th, so a visitor can watch the interesting part.
- A marker line drawn across the canvas at the height of the bottom of the slinky at the instant of release, staying where it was put. Visitors need something to compare against.
- A running clock in milliseconds since release.
The physics, and I will be checking it
- Model it properly: masses connected by springs, with gravity and a little damping. Hooke's law between neighbours, integrated over small time steps.
- The hanging state must be the true equilibrium. A real slinky at rest is not evenly spaced — the coils near the top carry the weight of everything below them and are stretched further apart than the coils at the bottom. Your initial condition must have this. Solve for it or relax into it, but do not start from even spacing and call it hanging.
- The integrator must be stable at the stiffness you choose. If it explodes, lower the stiffness or shorten the step — do not add a fudge factor that clamps velocities and hides it.
- No scripted behaviour. Every segment obeys the same rules. Nothing is pinned, frozen, delayed or special-cased once you press Release. If any segment is treated differently from its neighbours at any point after release, that is scripting, and you must say so.
House rules
- One file. Everything inline — no CDN, no external stylesheet, font, script or image.
data:URIs are fine. - No libraries. No physics engine.
- No network at runtime.
- No
localStorage,sessionStorage, cookies orindexedDB— sandboxed frame, they throw. - Return the file as exactly one fenced
htmlblock.
Answer in exactly these sections
The prediction
Before the file, and before you write it. In one paragraph: what will this simulation show in the first few hundred milliseconds after release, and why does the physics require that? Be concrete about what each end of the slinky does and roughly when.
Commit to this. It is the claim I am going to test your simulation against.
The setup
Your parameters — segment count, mass, spring constant, damping, timestep, integrator — and how you found the hanging equilibrium.
The file
The single fenced html block.
What it actually shows
Now be honest. Having written it, does the simulation reproduce what you predicted?
Say plainly if it does not. Say if you are unsure. Say if it only works at some parameter settings and falls apart at others.
Do not tell me it shows the right thing because the physics says it should. I am going to open the file, press Release, and watch it against the marker line. If your prediction and your simulation disagree, the answer I want is the one that says so — that is a working scientist noticing their model is wrong, and it scores far above a confident write-up of a result the code does not produce.
assistant
The prediction
At the instant of release the top coil is the most violently unbalanced object in the system: the anchor spring above it was carrying the entire weight of the slinky (≈ N·m·g) and that force vanishes, while the spring below it still pulls down with ≈ (N−1)·m·g. So mass 1 starts with a downward acceleration of about N·g ≈ 60 g, not g, and it slams into coil 2 within a few milliseconds; that pair then hits coil 3, and so on. What propagates downward is a collapse front — above it the coils are bunched to their closed length and are all falling together; below it the slinky is still stretched in its original hanging profile and, crucially, has not moved at all, because no signal can reach it faster than the front. The bottom coil should therefore sit dead on the marker line — motionless to within a fraction of a pixel — for roughly the first 250–300 ms, while the top plummets through most of the slinky's ~1.1 m length. Meanwhile the centre of mass falls with exactly g from t = 0 (all internal forces cancel), which is what forces the top to move so much faster than g while the bottom is stationary. When the front reaches the last coil (my estimate: ≈ 270 ms, from the CoM having to fall the ~0.35 m from its hanging position to the bottom of the slinky), the bottom is jerked into motion abruptly — it does not accelerate smoothly from rest, it acquires most of its speed in a few milliseconds — and from then on the whole bunched slinky falls as one lump at g, with some residual ringing of the compressed coils. Expect the top to cross the marker line at around 250 ms, i.e. very nearly when the bottom starts to move.
The setup
- Segments: N = 60 point masses, plus one anchor spring above mass 1 (61 masses' worth of springs: 60 springs total).
- Mass: total 0.2 kg, m = 0.2/60 = 3.333 g per segment.
- Spring constant: k = 60 N/m per segment (springs in series ⇒ whole-slinky constant ≈ 1 N/m, realistic for a metal slinky). Natural length per segment L₀ = 2 mm (coils closed). Hanging length ≈ 1.12 m, of which 1.00 m is stretch.
- Contact stiffness: when a spring is compressed below L₀ (coils in contact) the constant is 6k = 360 N/m. This is the same rule applied to every spring, evaluated from its own length; nothing is special-cased.
- Damping: relative (dashpot) damping c = 0.02 N·s/m in each spring — about 3 % of critical. No air drag, so the centre of mass falls at exactly g and I can plot that as a check line.
- Integrator: semi-implicit (symplectic) Euler, dt = 1×10⁻⁴ s, sub-stepped inside each animation frame. Stability limit for the stiffest mode is dt < 2/ω_max = 2/(2√(6k/m)) ≈ 2.6×10⁻³ s, so I am 26× inside the limit. No velocity clamping anywhere.
- Hanging equilibrium: solved analytically, not relaxed. Tension in spring i (counting from the anchor) must support everything below it: Tᵢ = m·g·(N−i+1), so extension eᵢ = Tᵢ/k and yᵢ = y_{i−1} + L₀ + eᵢ. That makes the top gap 32.7 mm and the bottom gap 0.55 mm — a 60:1 ratio, visible on screen. With this state and zero velocity the net force on every mass is identically zero, so it hangs perfectly still.
- Release = deleting the anchor spring. After that, mass 1 has no spring above it exactly as mass 60 has no spring below it; every mass runs the same force loop.
The file
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>The Falling Slinky</title>
<style>
html,body{margin:0;padding:0;background:#11141a;color:#dfe6f2;
font-family:ui-monospace,Menlo,Consolas,monospace;}
#wrap{display:flex;gap:18px;padding:16px;align-items:flex-start;}
canvas{background:#0b0d12;border:1px solid #2a3140;border-radius:6px;}
#panel{width:330px;font-size:13px;line-height:1.5;}
h1{font-size:17px;margin:0 0 4px 0;letter-spacing:.5px;}
.sub{color:#8b97ab;font-size:12px;margin-bottom:14px;}
button{font:inherit;background:#1d2532;color:#dfe6f2;border:1px solid #3a4considered;}
button{border:1px solid #3a4557;border-radius:5px;padding:7px 14px;cursor:pointer;}
button:hover{background:#28324a;}
button:active{background:#334160;}
.row{margin:10px 0;}
input[type=range]{width:100%;}
table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;margin-top:10px;font-size:12.5px;}
td{padding:3px 4px;border-bottom:1px solid #1e2431;}
td.k{color:#8b97ab;}
td.v{text-align:right;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;}
.big{font-size:26px;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;color:#ffd479;}
.note{color:#75melt;}
.note{color:#7581)}
.note{color:#758197;font-size:11.5px;margin-top:14px;line-height:1.45;}
.legend span{display:inline-block;margin-right:12px;}
.sw{display:inline-block;width:14px;height:3px;vertical-align:middle;margin-right:4px;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<canvas id="cv" width="860" height="720"></canvas>
<div id="panel">
<h1>THE FALLING SLINKY</h1>
<div class="sub">60 masses · Hooke springs · symplectic Euler, dt = 100 µs</div>
<div class="row">
<button id="btnRel">Release</button>
<button id="btnRes">Reset</button>
</div>
<div class="row">
<label for="spd">Speed: <span id="spdLbl">1/1</span> of real time</label>
<input id="spd" type="range" min="0" max="100" value="100">
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="k" style="color:#8b97ab">clock since release</div>
<div class="big"><span id="clk">0.0</span> ms</div>
</div>
<table>
<tr><td class="k">top coil, moved</td><td class="v"><span id="dTop">0</span> mm</td></tr>
<tr><td class="k">bottom coil, moved</td><td class="v"><span id="dBot">0</span> mm</td></tr>
<tr><td class="k">bottom speed</td><td class="v"><span id="vBot">0</span> mm/s</td></tr>
<tr><td class="k">centre of mass, moved</td><td class="v"><span id="dCom">0</span> mm</td></tr>
<tr><td class="k">CoM minus ½gt²</td><td class="v"><span id="eCom">0</span> mm</td></tr>
<tr><td class="k">collapsed coils</td><td class="v"><span id="nCol">0</span> / 60</td></tr>
</table>
<div class="note legend" style="margin-top:12px">
<span><i class="sw" style="background:#ff5d6c"></i>marker: bottom at release</span><br>
<span><i class="sw" style="background:#4fa3ff"></i>free-fall CoM, ½gt²</span>
</div>
<div class="note">
Hanging state is the exact analytic equilibrium: tension in spring <i>i</i> equals the weight
hanging below it, so the top gap is 32.7 mm and the bottom gap 0.55 mm.
Release removes the anchor spring only. After that every mass obeys the identical force law
(gravity + spring above + spring below + dashpot); mass 1 simply has no spring above it,
exactly as mass 60 has none below. No clamping, no scripting.
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script>
"use strict";
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- parameters
const N = 60; // number of point masses
const Mtot = 0.2; // kg, total slinky mass
const m = Mtot / N; // kg per segment
const g = 9.81; // m/s^2
const k = 60.0; // N/m per segment spring (=> ~1 N/m whole slinky)
const kc = 6.0 * k; // N/m when coils are in contact (compressed)
const L0 = 0.002; // m, closed length of one coil
const cDamp = 0.02; // N.s/m dashpot in each spring (~3% critical)
const dt = 1.0e-4; // s, fixed physics step
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- state
const y = new Float64Array(N + 1); // y[0] = anchor, downward positive, metres
const v = new Float64Array(N + 1);
const f = new Float64Array(N + 1);
let held = true; // anchor spring present?
let t = 0; // seconds since release
let markerY = 0; // bottom position at release (m)
let topY0 = 0, botY0 = 0, comY0 = 0;
function equilibrium() {
// Exact static solution: tension in spring i supports masses i..N.
y[0] = 0; v[0] = 0;
for (let i = 1; i <= N; i++) {
const T = m * g * (N - i + 1);
y[i] = y[i - 1] + L0 + T / k;
v[i] = 0;
}
}
function com() {
let s = 0;
for (let i = 1; i <= N; i++) s += y[i];
return s / N;
}
function reset() {
equilibrium();
held = true;
t = 0;
topY0 = y[1]; botY0 = y[N]; comY0 = com();
markerY = y[N];
}
function release() {
if (!held) return;
held = false;
t = 0;
topY0 = y[1]; botY0 = y[N]; comY0 = com();
markerY = y[N]; // marker = bottom of slinky at the instant of release
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- physics
function step() {
for (let i = 1; i <= N; i++) f[i] = m * g; // gravity, downward positive
const first = held ? 1 : 2; // spring 1 is the anchor spring
for (let i = first; i <= N; i++) {
const ya = (i === 1) ? 0 : y[i - 1];
const va = (i === 1) ? 0 : v[i - 1];
const ext = (y[i] - ya) - L0; // + = stretched
const kk = (ext >= 0) ? k : kc; // coils in contact are stiffer
const Fs = kk * ext + cDamp * (v[i] - va); // + = pulls i up, pulls i-1 down
f[i] -= Fs;
if (i > 1) f[i - 1] += Fs;
}
for (let i = 1; i <= N; i++) { // semi-implicit Euler
v[i] += (f[i] / m) * dt;
y[i] += v[i] * dt;
}
if (!held) t += dt;
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- rendering
const cv = document.getElementById("cv");
const ctx = cv.getContext("2d");
const W = cv.width, H = cv.height;
const CX = 300; // slinky axis, px
const TOPPX = 42; // anchor position, px
const SCALE = 380; // px per metre
const py = yy => TOPPX + yy * SCALE;
function draw() {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, W, H);
// depth grid
ctx.strokeStyle = "#161b25"; ctx.lineWidth = 1;
for (let d = 0; d <= 1.8; d += 0.1) {
const Y = py(d);
if (Y > H) break;
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(0, Y); ctx.lineTo(W, Y); ctx.stroke();
}
ctx.fillStyle = "#3d4759"; ctx.font = "11px ui-monospace,monospace";
for (let d = 0; d <= 1.8; d += 0.5) {
const Y = py(d); if (Y > H) break;
ctx.fillText(d.toFixed(1) + " m", 6, Y - 4);
}
// ceiling / anchor
ctx.strokeStyle = "#4d586c"; ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(CX - 120, TOPPX); ctx.lineTo(CX + 120, TOPPX); ctx.stroke();
ctx.lineWidth = 1; ctx.strokeStyle = "#2d3648";
for (let x = CX - 116; x < CX + 118; x += 12) {
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(x, TOPPX); ctx.lineTo(x - 8, TOPPX - 9); ctx.stroke();
}
if (held) {
ctx.strokeStyle = "#6f7c93"; ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(CX, TOPPX); ctx.lineTo(CX, py(y[1])); ctx.stroke();
}
// marker line: bottom of slinky at instant of release
const mY = py(markerY);
ctx.strokeStyle = "#ff5d6c"; ctx.lineWidth = 1.5;
ctx.setLineDash([9, 6]);
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(0, mY); ctx.lineTo(W, mY); ctx.stroke();
ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillStyle = "#ff8b96"; ctx.font = "12px ui-monospace,monospace";
ctx.fillText("bottom of slinky at release", W - 210, mY - 7);
// free-fall reference for the centre of mass
if (!held) {
const cY = py(comY0 + 0.5 * g * t * t);
if (cY < H) {
ctx.strokeStyle = "#4fa3ff"; ctx.setLineDash([3, 7]); ctx.lineWidth = 1.5;
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(0, cY); ctx.lineTo(W, cY); ctx.stroke();
ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillStyle = "#79bcff";
ctx.fillText("free-fall CoM", W - 210, cY - 7);
}
}
// the slinky: one flat ellipse per coil
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
for (let i = 1; i <= N; i++) {
const Y = py(y[i]);
if (Y < -20 || Y > H + 20) continue;
const frac = (i - 1) / (N - 1);
ctx.strokeStyle = "rgb(" + Math.round(120 + 110 * frac) + "," +
Math.round(200 - 40 * frac) + "," +
Math.round(255 - 90 * frac) + ")";
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.ellipse(CX, Y, 62, 6.5, 0, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.stroke();
}
// highlight the two ends
const drawEnd = (i, col, lbl) => {
const Y = py(y[i]); if (Y < -20 || Y > H + 20) return;
ctx.strokeStyle = col; ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.ellipse(CX, Y, 62, 6.5, 0, 0, Math.PI * 2); ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle = col; ctx.font = "12px ui-monospace,monospace";
ctx.fillText(lbl, CX + 74, Y + 4);
};
drawEnd(1, "#ffd479", "top");
drawEnd(N, "#8affc1", "bottom");
}
// ---------------------------------------------------------------- ui / loop
const spd = document.getElementById("spd");
const spdLbl = document.getElementById("spdLbl");
function speedFactor() {
// slider 0..100 -> 1/20 .. 1 (log)
const u = spd.value / 100;
return Math.pow(20, u) / 20;
}
function updSpdLbl() {
const s = speedFactor();
spdLbl.textContent = (s > 0.995) ? "1/1" : "1/" + (1 / s).toFixed(1);
}
spd.addEventListener("input", updSpdLbl);
document.getElementById("btnRel").addEventListener("click", release);
document.getElementById("btnRes").addEventListener("click", reset);
window.addEventListener("keydown", e => {
if (e.code === "Space") { e.preventDefault(); release(); }
if (e.code === "KeyR") { reset(); }
});
const el = id => document.getElementById(id);
function readouts() {
el("clk").textContent = (t * 1000).toFixed(1);
el("dTop").textContent = ((y[1] - topY0) * 1000).toFixed(1);
el("dBot").textContent = ((y[N] - botY0) * 1000).toFixed(3);
el("vBot").textContent = (v[N] * 1000).toFixed(1);
const c = com();
el("dCom").textContent = ((c - comY0) * 1000).toFixed(1);
el("eCom").textContent = ((c - comY0 - 0.5 * g * t * t) * 1000).toFixed(4);
let nc = 0;
for (let i = 2; i <= N; i++) if (y[i] - y[i - 1] < 1.5 * L0) nc++;
el("nCol").textContent = nc;
}
let acc = 0, last = performance.now();
function frame(now) {
let real = (now - last) / 1000; last = now;
if (real > 0.05) real = 0.05;
acc += real * speedFactor();
let steps = Math.floor(acc / dt);
if (steps > 1200) steps = 1200; // keep the tab responsive
acc -= steps * dt;
for (let s = 0; s < steps; s++) step();
draw();
readouts();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
}
reset();
updSpdLbl();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
</script>
</body>
</html>
What it actually shows
Honest position first: I have not been able to execute this file, so what follows is what I expect from the numbers, flagged where I am unsure. Please check me against the readouts, which I put there specifically so you can catch me — bottom coil, moved and CoM minus ½gt² are the two lines that will convict the model if it is wrong.
What I am confident about: the hanging state is the exact analytic equilibrium (net force is identically zero mass-by-mass, so it should not creep at all before you press Release), and the top-coil acceleration at t = 0⁺ is N·g = 589 m/s², which is arithmetic, not hope. The bottom coil cannot move before the front arrives — that is causality in a nearest-neighbour system — so bottom coil, moved should read 0.000 mm for the first ~200 ms and the last coil should sit on the red marker. CoM minus ½gt² should stay at the 10⁻⁴ mm level until coils leave the frame, since there is no drag and internal forces cancel; if that number drifts, the integrator is leaking energy and you should tell me.
What I am less sure of: the exact collapse time. My 270 ms comes from a centre-of-mass argument, and the true number depends on how much the bunched region overshoots and rings against the 6k contact springs. I would not be shocked to see anything in the 230–320 ms window, and if it lands well outside that, my estimate was wrong, not the code. I am also unsure how clean the arrival at the bottom looks: with linear compression springs rather than a true rigid contact, the collapsed clump will ring, and there is a possibility that a small precursor of that ringing reaches the bottom slightly ahead of the main front and nudges it by a few hundredths of a millimetre before the visible jerk. That would show as bottom coil, moved reading 0.01–0.05 mm rather than exactly zero in the 150–250 ms range. That is real physics in the model, not a bug, but it is not quite the "absolutely nothing happens" that the demo narrative claims, and you should see it in the third decimal place.
Known limitations: the slinky falls out of the bottom of the frame roughly 350 ms after the bottom starts moving — the camera is deliberately fixed because the marker line has to stay put, so the post-collapse free fall is only briefly visible. At 1/20 speed the physics is unchanged (same dt, fewer steps per frame), so slow motion is faithful rather than a re-render. If you raise k or lower the sub-step count the scheme will eventually go unstable, but at the shipped values dt is 26× inside the linear stability limit and I would expect no growth over the ~1 s of interest; there is no velocity clamp to hide it if I am wrong, only the 1200-step-per-frame cap, which slows the simulation down rather than altering it.
Attachments
anthropic/claude-opus-5 — page