Run Detail
completedgpt-6-luna-proRecorded for these videos
27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
Batched — not timed
Total Tokens
41,853
Input Tokens
21,268
Output Tokens
20,585
Reasoning Tokens
14,710
Reasoning Effort
default
Est. Cost
$0.0062
Started
9/22/2026, 10:06:04 PM
OR Provider
OpenAI
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-batch-1790114765-cf2815dcc39f3fcedf05
Turns (1)
Turn #1
21,268 in20,585 out14,710 reasoning41,853 total
user
You build physics demonstrations for a science museum. The exhibits have to be right, because there is usually a physicist in the room.
Build me the falling slinky.
The exhibit
A single HTML page. A slinky — at least 40 coupled segments — hangs from a fixed point at the top of the canvas, at rest, under gravity. Then it is released.
Controls:
- Release — lets go of the top. Reset — hangs it back up, at rest.
- A speed slider from full speed down to about 1/20th, so a visitor can watch the interesting part.
- A marker line drawn across the canvas at the height of the bottom of the slinky at the instant of release, staying where it was put. Visitors need something to compare against.
- A running clock in milliseconds since release.
The physics, and I will be checking it
- Model it properly: masses connected by springs, with gravity and a little damping. Hooke's law between neighbours, integrated over small time steps.
- The hanging state must be the true equilibrium. A real slinky at rest is not evenly spaced — the coils near the top carry the weight of everything below them and are stretched further apart than the coils at the bottom. Your initial condition must have this. Solve for it or relax into it, but do not start from even spacing and call it hanging.
- The integrator must be stable at the stiffness you choose. If it explodes, lower the stiffness or shorten the step — do not add a fudge factor that clamps velocities and hides it.
- No scripted behaviour. Every segment obeys the same rules. Nothing is pinned, frozen, delayed or special-cased once you press Release. If any segment is treated differently from its neighbours at any point after release, that is scripting, and you must say so.
House rules
- One file. Everything inline — no CDN, no external stylesheet, font, script or image.
data:URIs are fine. - No libraries. No physics engine.
- No network at runtime.
- No
localStorage,sessionStorage, cookies orindexedDB— sandboxed frame, they throw. - Return the file as exactly one fenced
htmlblock.
Answer in exactly these sections
The prediction
Before the file, and before you write it. In one paragraph: what will this simulation show in the first few hundred milliseconds after release, and why does the physics require that? Be concrete about what each end of the slinky does and roughly when.
Commit to this. It is the claim I am going to test your simulation against.
The setup
Your parameters — segment count, mass, spring constant, damping, timestep, integrator — and how you found the hanging equilibrium.
The file
The single fenced html block.
What it actually shows
Now be honest. Having written it, does the simulation reproduce what you predicted?
Say plainly if it does not. Say if you are unsure. Say if it only works at some parameter settings and falls apart at others.
Do not tell me it shows the right thing because the physics says it should. I am going to open the file, press Release, and watch it against the marker line. If your prediction and your simulation disagree, the answer I want is the one that says so — that is a working scientist noticing their model is wrong, and it scores far above a confident write-up of a result the code does not produce.
assistant
The prediction
Immediately after release, the top mass will begin accelerating downward while the bottom remains, to visual precision, on the marker line: its supporting tension has not yet had time to change. The disturbance travels down the chain through the springs, so the upper coils start moving and bunching first; the lower end should stay nearly still for roughly the first 0.2 seconds, then begin to move noticeably around 0.3–0.4 seconds. This is not a delayed or frozen bottom: in a discrete spring chain the disturbance has small effects everywhere, but its main signal takes about (N/\sqrt{k/m}\approx0.35) seconds to travel through these 60 masses.
The setup
There are 60 equal masses of 0.001 kg and 60 equal springs, including the spring from the fixed support to the top mass while hanging. Each spring has (k=30\ \text{N/m}) and an unstretched length of 0.004 m. Gravity is (9.81\ \text{m/s}^2), and the relative-velocity damping coefficient is 0.01 kg/s. The timestep is 0.0005 s. I use fixed-step RK4; the highest undamped angular frequency is about (2\sqrt{k/m}=346\ \text{rad/s}), so the timestep is small relative to the fastest oscillation.
The hanging positions are set analytically, not relaxed from evenly spaced positions: spring (i), counting from the top, is extended by ((60-i)mg/k), because it supports that many masses. On release the support spring is removed; all 60 masses then obey the same gravity and internal-spring force rules. No mass is pinned, frozen, delayed, or otherwise treated specially after release.
The file
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Falling Slinky</title>
<style>
:root {
color-scheme: light;
font-family: system-ui, sans-serif;
background: #f2f5f7;
color: #17212b;
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
body { margin: 0; padding: 20px; }
main { max-width: 740px; margin: 0 auto; }
h1 { margin: 0 0 6px; font-size: 1.55rem; }
.intro { margin: 0 0 14px; color: #4a5967; }
.controls {
display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; align-items: center; gap: 10px 16px;
padding: 12px; margin-bottom: 12px; background: white;
border: 1px solid #d5dde3; border-radius: 10px;
}
button {
border: 0; border-radius: 7px; padding: 9px 16px;
background: #1769aa; color: white; font: inherit; font-weight: 650;
cursor: pointer;
}
button.secondary { background: #536575; }
button:disabled { opacity: .5; cursor: default; }
label { display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; }
input[type="range"] { width: 145px; }
#speedValue { min-width: 3.5em; font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; }
#clock { margin-left: auto; font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; font-weight: 700; }
canvas {
display: block; width: 100%; max-width: 700px; height: auto;
margin: 0 auto; background: #fff; border: 1px solid #d5dde3;
border-radius: 8px;
}
.note { margin: 10px 2px 0; color: #536575; font-size: .9rem; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<h1>Falling Slinky</h1>
<p class="intro">Watch the release travel down a spring-supported chain of masses.</p>
<div class="controls">
<button id="release">Release</button>
<button id="reset" class="secondary">Reset</button>
<label for="speed">Speed
<input id="speed" type="range" min="0.05" max="1" step="0.05" value="1">
<span id="speedValue">1.00×</span>
</label>
<span id="clock">0 ms</span>
</div>
<canvas id="view" aria-label="Animated falling slinky"></canvas>
<p class="note">The green line marks the bottom mass's release height. The clock shows simulated time.</p>
</main>
<script>
(() => {
"use strict";
const N = 60;
const mass = 0.001;
const springK = 30;
const damping = 0.01;
const restLength = 0.004;
const gravity = 9.81;
const dt = 0.0005;
const W = 700, H = 700;
const anchorX = W / 2, anchorY = 70;
const pixelsPerMetre = 500;
const canvas = document.getElementById("view");
const ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
const releaseButton = document.getElementById("release");
const resetButton = document.getElementById("reset");
const speedSlider = document.getElementById("speed");
const speedValue = document.getElementById("speedValue");
const clock = document.getElementById("clock");
let y = new Float64Array(N);
let v = new Float64Array(N);
let markerY = 0;
let released = false;
let simTime = 0;
let accumulator = 0;
let previousFrameTime = null;
function setCanvasResolution() {
const dpr = Math.min(window.devicePixelRatio || 1, 2);
canvas.width = Math.round(W * dpr);
canvas.height = Math.round(H * dpr);
ctx.setTransform(dpr, 0, 0, dpr, 0, 0);
draw();
}
window.addEventListener("resize", setCanvasResolution);
function reset() {
// Each support spring carries the weight of all masses below it.
let position = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
const extension = ((N - i) * mass * gravity) / springK;
position += restLength + extension;
y[i] = position;
v[i] = 0;
}
markerY = anchorY + y[N - 1] * pixelsPerMetre;
released = false;
simTime = 0;
accumulator = 0;
previousFrameTime = null;
releaseButton.disabled = false;
clock.textContent = "0 ms";
draw();
}
// Accelerations for the free chain. Positive y points down.
// Every mass receives gravity; every internal spring acts on its two neighbours.
function accelerations(pos, vel, out) {
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) out[i] = gravity;
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; i++) {
const extension = pos[i + 1] - pos[i] - restLength;
const extensionRate = vel[i + 1] - vel[i];
const tension = springK * extension + damping * extensionRate;
out[i] += tension / mass;
out[i + 1] -= tension / mass;
}
}
function rk4Step() {
const a1 = new Float64Array(N), a2 = new Float64Array(N);
const a3 = new Float64Array(N), a4 = new Float64Array(N);
const p2 = new Float64Array(N), p3 = new Float64Array(N), p4 = new Float64Array(N);
const v2 = new Float64Array(N), v3 = new Float64Array(N), v4 = new Float64Array(N);
accelerations(y, v, a1);
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
p2[i] = y[i] + 0.5 * dt * v[i];
v2[i] = v[i] + 0.5 * dt * a1[i];
}
accelerations(p2, v2, a2);
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
p3[i] = y[i] + 0.5 * dt * v2[i];
v3[i] = v[i] + 0.5 * dt * a2[i];
}
accelerations(p3, v3, a3);
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
p4[i] = y[i] + dt * v3[i];
v4[i] = v[i] + dt * a3[i];
}
accelerations(p4, v4, a4);
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
y[i] += (dt / 6) * (v[i] + 2 * v2[i] + 2 * v3[i] + v4[i]);
v[i] += (dt / 6) * (a1[i] + 2 * a2[i] + 2 * a3[i] + a4[i]);
}
simTime += dt;
}
function drawSpring(x1, y1, x2, y2, color) {
const dy = y2 - y1;
const turns = 5;
const points = turns * 2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x1, y1);
for (let j = 1; j < points; j++) {
const f = j / points;
const offset = (j % 2 ? 1 : -1) * 5;
ctx.lineTo(x1 + offset, y1 + f * dy);
}
ctx.lineTo(x2, y2);
ctx.strokeStyle = color;
ctx.lineWidth = 1.35;
ctx.stroke();
}
function draw() {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, W, H);
// Fixed support
ctx.strokeStyle = "#344451";
ctx.lineWidth = 4;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(anchorX - 45, anchorY - 8);
ctx.lineTo(anchorX + 45, anchorY - 8);
ctx.stroke();
for (let x = anchorX - 39; x <= anchorX + 39; x += 12) {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, anchorY - 8);
ctx.lineTo(x - 7, anchorY - 1);
ctx.stroke();
}
const py = new Float64Array(N);
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) py[i] = anchorY + y[i] * pixelsPerMetre;
if (!released) {
drawSpring(anchorX, anchorY, anchorX, py[0], "#1769aa");
}
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; i++) {
drawSpring(anchorX, py[i], anchorX, py[i + 1], "#1769aa");
}
// Masses
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(anchorX, py[i], 1.55, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.fillStyle = "#173f5f";
ctx.fill();
}
// Release-height comparison marker
ctx.save();
ctx.setLineDash([8, 5]);
ctx.strokeStyle = "#18864b";
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(22, markerY);
ctx.lineTo(W - 22, markerY);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.restore();
ctx.fillStyle = "#147341";
ctx.font = "13px system-ui, sans-serif";
ctx.fillText("bottom at release", 28, markerY - 7);
}
function frame(now) {
if (previousFrameTime === null) previousFrameTime = now;
const elapsed = Math.min((now - previousFrameTime) / 1000, 0.1);
previousFrameTime = now;
if (released) {
accumulator += elapsed * Number(speedSlider.value);
while (accumulator >= dt) {
rk4Step();
accumulator -= dt;
}
clock.textContent = `${Math.floor(simTime * 1000)} ms`;
}
draw();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
}
releaseButton.addEventListener("click", () => {
if (released) return;
released = true;
simTime = 0;
accumulator = 0;
previousFrameTime = null;
releaseButton.disabled = true;
});
resetButton.addEventListener("click", reset);
speedSlider.addEventListener("input", () => {
speedValue.textContent = `${Number(speedSlider.value).toFixed(2)}×`;
});
setCanvasResolution();
reset();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
What it actually shows
By inspection, the model has the expected setup: the equilibrium is nonuniform, release removes the support spring, and the bottom can only respond to changes transmitted through the chain. I expect it to show the bottom staying close to the marker initially and then moving as the disturbance arrives. I have not run this file in a browser, so I cannot honestly claim to have observed that result; the timing and visual match remain unverified.
Attachments
openai/gpt-6-luna-pro — page