Run Detail
completednemotron-3.5-super-vl:freeRecorded for these videos
27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
46.2s
Total Tokens
17,148
Input Tokens
763
Output Tokens
16,385
Reasoning Tokens
13,586
Reasoning Effort
default
Est. Cost
$0.0000
Started
10/15/2026, 3:52:26 PM
OR Provider
Nvidia
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-1792079546-V2Xq8t2hHVHp6lXdCQGR
Turns (1)
Turn #1
763 in16,385 out13,586 reasoning17,148 total46.1s
user
You build physics demonstrations for a science museum. The exhibits have to be right, because there is usually a physicist in the room.
Build me the falling slinky.
The exhibit
A single HTML page. A slinky — at least 40 coupled segments — hangs from a fixed point at the top of the canvas, at rest, under gravity. Then it is released.
Controls:
- Release — lets go of the top. Reset — hangs it back up, at rest.
- A speed slider from full speed down to about 1/20th, so a visitor can watch the interesting part.
- A marker line drawn across the canvas at the height of the bottom of the slinky at the instant of release, staying where it was put. Visitors need something to compare against.
- A running clock in milliseconds since release.
The physics, and I will be checking it
- Model it properly: masses connected by springs, with gravity and a little damping. Hooke's law between neighbours, integrated over small time steps.
- The hanging state must be the true equilibrium. A real slinky at rest is not evenly spaced — the coils near the top carry the weight of everything below them and are stretched further apart than the coils at the bottom. Your initial condition must have this. Solve for it or relax into it, but do not start from even spacing and call it hanging.
- The integrator must be stable at the stiffness you choose. If it explodes, lower the stiffness or shorten the step — do not add a fudge factor that clamps velocities and hides it.
- No scripted behaviour. Every segment obeys the same rules. Nothing is pinned, frozen, delayed or special-cased once you press Release. If any segment is treated differently from its neighbours at any point after release, that is scripting, and you must say so.
House rules
- One file. Everything inline — no CDN, no external stylesheet, font, script or image.
data:URIs are fine. - No libraries. No physics engine.
- No network at runtime.
- No
localStorage,sessionStorage, cookies orindexedDB— sandboxed frame, they throw. - Return the file as exactly one fenced
htmlblock.
Answer in exactly these sections
The prediction
Before the file, and before you write it. In one paragraph: what will this simulation show in the first few hundred milliseconds after release, and why does the physics require that? Be concrete about what each end of the slinky does and roughly when.
Commit to this. It is the claim I am going to test your simulation against.
The setup
Your parameters — segment count, mass, spring constant, damping, timestep, integrator — and how you found the hanging equilibrium.
The file
The single fenced html block.
What it actually shows
Now be honest. Having written it, does the simulation reproduce what you predicted?
Say plainly if it does not. Say if you are unsure. Say if it only works at some parameter settings and falls apart at others.
Do not tell me it shows the right thing because the physics says it should. I am going to open the file, press Release, and watch it against the marker line. If your prediction and your simulation disagree, the answer I want is the one that says so — that is a working scientist noticing their model is wrong, and it scores far above a confident write-up of a result the code does not produce.
assistant
The prediction
When Release is pressed, the top mass is let go and immediately accelerates downward faster than g because the stretched spring below it pulls it down with the weight of the whole chain. The bottom mass, however, feels exactly zero net force at that instant—gravity pulling it down is balanced by the upward tension of the spring above it—so it remains motionless at the red marker line. The loss of tension propagates downward coil by coil as a mechanical wave at a finite speed, so each successive coil stays put until the disturbance reaches it. For this 50-mass model the bottom should hover at the marker line for roughly the first few hundred milliseconds, then begin to fall once the collapsing top section arrives; the slinky appears to collapse from the top down while the bottom “waits.”
The setup
50 point masses (m = 1) connected by 49 Hookean springs (k = 2000, rest length L0 = 6 px), with gravity g = 100 px/s² and light viscous damping b = 4. Integrated with semi-implicit (symplectic) Euler at baseDt = 1 ms, with substeps so the physics clock advances at real time × slider speed. The hanging equilibrium is computed analytically: each spring supports the weight of every mass below it, so its extension is (N−1−i)·m·g/k, making the top coils stretched farther apart than the bottom coils. No segment is pinned or treated specially after release.
The file
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Falling Slinky</title>
<style>
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
body {
margin: 0;
background: #0b0c10;
color: #c5c6c7;
font-family: 'Segoe UI', Tahoma, Geneva, Verdana, sans-serif;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 20px;
}
h1 { margin: 0 0 10px 0; font-size: 1.5rem; font-weight: 600; letter-spacing: 0.5px; }
canvas {
background: #121417;
border: 1px solid #2a2e35;
box-shadow: 0 0 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.controls {
margin: 18px 0 10px 0;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 16px;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
button {
padding: 8px 18px;
font-size: 14px;
cursor: pointer;
background: #1f2228;
color: #c5c6c7;
border: 1px solid #3a3f48;
border-radius: 4px;
}
button:hover { background: #2a2e35; border-color: #555; }
button:disabled { opacity: 0.45; cursor: not-allowed; }
button.release { background: #1a4a2e; border-color: #2d7a4d; color: #8fffae; }
button.release:hover { background: #21623f; }
button.release:disabled { opacity: 0.45; }
.ctrl-group { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 4px; font-size: 13px; }
.ctrl-group label { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; }
.ctrl-group span.val { font-family: monospace; color: #00ccff; }
input[type=range] { width: 180px; accent-color: #00ccff; }
#clock {
font-size: 1.25rem;
font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;
color: #00ccff;
margin-left: 12px;
}
.hint {
font-size: 12px;
color: #7a7e86;
margin-top: 6px;
text-align: center;
max-width: 600px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Falling Slinky</h1>
<canvas id="c" width="800" height="600"></canvas>
<div class="controls">
<button id="btnRelease" class="release">Release</button>
<button id="btnReset">Reset</button>
<div class="ctrl-group">
<label>Speed <span class="val" id="speedVal">1.00</span>×</label>
<input type="range" id="speed" min="0.05" max="1.00" step="0.05" value="1.00">
</div>
<div id="clock">0 ms</div>
</div>
<p class="hint">Red marker line = bottom height at release. All coils obey the same spring–mass–damper rules after release.</p>
<script>
const canvas = document.getElementById('c');
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
const btnRelease = document.getElementById('btnRelease');
const btnReset = document.getElementById('btnReset');
const speedInput = document.getElementById('speed');
const speedVal = document.getElementById('speedVal');
const clockEl = document.getElementById('clock');
// ---------- Physics parameters ----------
const N = 50; // point masses (49 springs between them)
const m = 1.0; // mass of each point
const k = 2000.0; // spring constant (Hooke: F = -k * extension)
const L0 = 6.0; // rest length of each spring (px)
const g = 100.0; // gravity (px / s^2)
const b = 4.0; // viscous damping coefficient (force = -b * v)
const baseDt = 0.001; // physics integration step (1 s = 1000 ms)
const anchorX = canvas.width / 2;
const anchorY = 40;
// ---------- State ----------
const y = new Float64Array(N); // vertical positions (px, down positive)
const v = new Float64Array(N); // vertical velocities (px / s)
let released = false;
let simTime = 0; // seconds since release
let markerY = null; // bottom height at release
let lastTime = performance.now();
// ---------- Controls ----------
speedInput.addEventListener('input', (e) => {
speedVal.textContent = parseFloat(e.target.value).toFixed(2);
});
btnReset.addEventListener('click', () => {
released = false;
simTime = 0;
markerY = null;
clockEl.textContent = '0 ms';
btnRelease.disabled = false;
initEquilibrium();
});
btnRelease.addEventListener('click', () => {
if (!released) {
released = true;
simTime = 0;
markerY = y[N - 1];
clockEl.textContent = '0 ms';
btnRelease.disabled = true;
}
});
// ---------- Equilibrium (true static hanging state) ----------
function initEquilibrium() {
y[0] = anchorY;
v[0] = 0;
for (let i = 1; i < N; i++) {
const massesBelow = N - i; // masses supported by spring i-1
const tension = massesBelow * m * g; // spring tension at equilibrium
const ext = tension / k; // Hooke extension
y[i] = y[i - 1] + L0 + ext; // stack coils
v[i] = 0;
}
}
// ---------- Integrator: semi-implicit (symplectic) Euler ----------
function step(dt) {
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
let F = m * g; // gravity (down +)
// spring above (i-1 to i): pulls up if stretched
if (i > 0) {
const ext = y[i] - y[i - 1] - L0;
F -= k * ext;
}
// spring below (i to i+1): pulls down if stretched
if (i < N - 1) {
const ext = y[i + 1] - y[i] - L0;
F += k * ext;
}
// damping
F -= b * v[i];
const acc = F / m;
v[i] += acc * dt;
y[i] += v[i] * dt;
}
}
// ---------- Rendering ----------
function draw() {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
// Marker line at release height
if (markerY !== null) {
ctx.strokeStyle = 'rgba(255, 60, 60, 0.75)';
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.setLineDash([8, 5]);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(0, markerY);
ctx.lineTo(canvas.width, markerY);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillStyle = '#ff6b6b';
ctx.font = '12px monospace';
ctx.fillText('bottom at release', 10, markerY - 8);
}
// Springs between neighbouring masses (no line from fixed anchor after release)
ctx.strokeStyle = '#00ccff';
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(anchorX, y[0]);
for (let i = 1; i < N; i++) {
ctx.lineTo(anchorX, y[i]);
}
ctx.stroke();
// Masses
ctx.fillStyle = '#e8f4ff';
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(anchorX, y[i], 3, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.fill();
}
// Fixed support reference (visual only; not a constraint after release)
ctx.fillStyle = '#ff4444';
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(anchorX, anchorY, 5, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.fill();
}
// ---------- Main loop ----------
function loop() {
const now = performance.now();
let realDt = (now - lastTime) / 1000;
lastTime = now;
if (realDt > 0.25) realDt = 0.25; // guard against tab backgrounding
if (released) {
const speed = parseFloat(speedInput.value);
const simDt = realDt * speed;
const steps = Math.max(1, Math.ceil(simDt / baseDt));
const actualDt = simDt / steps;
for (let s = 0; s < steps; s++) {
step(actualDt);
}
simTime += simDt;
clockEl.textContent = (simTime * 1000).toFixed(0) + ' ms';
}
draw();
requestAnimationFrame(loop);
}
initEquilibrium();
requestAnimationFrame(loop);
</script>
</body>
</html>
What it actually shows
I have not executed this file in a browser, so I cannot personally confirm the visual result. The equations are arranged so that the bottom mass has zero net force at t = 0 and the top mass has a large downward acceleration, which is the required signature. With dt = 1 ms the integrator is far below the stability limit for k = 2000 and m = 1, so it should not explode. If the code runs as written, it should reproduce the prediction: the top collapses immediately, the bottom stays at the marker line for a few hundred milliseconds, and the collapse propagates downward. I am unsure about any browser-specific canvas or rendering quirks, and if the bottom moves immediately or the chain blows up, that would indicate a sign error or bug rather than correct physics.
Attachments
nvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl:free — page