Run Detail
completedgpt-6.1-sol-proRecorded for these videos
27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
Batched — not timed
Total Tokens
29,484
Input Tokens
16,287
Output Tokens
13,197
Reasoning Tokens
4,656
Reasoning Effort
default
Cached Input Tokens
14,609
Est. Cost
$0.0823
Started
10/27/2026, 10:38:46 AM
OR Provider
OpenAI
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-batch-1793097525-44b35a0c6cbb831ba394
Turns (1)
Turn #1
16,287 in13,197 out4,656 reasoning14,609 cached29,484 total
user
You build physics demonstrations for a science museum. The exhibits have to be right, because there is usually a physicist in the room.
Build me the falling slinky.
The exhibit
A single HTML page. A slinky — at least 40 coupled segments — hangs from a fixed point at the top of the canvas, at rest, under gravity. Then it is released.
Controls:
- Release — lets go of the top. Reset — hangs it back up, at rest.
- A speed slider from full speed down to about 1/20th, so a visitor can watch the interesting part.
- A marker line drawn across the canvas at the height of the bottom of the slinky at the instant of release, staying where it was put. Visitors need something to compare against.
- A running clock in milliseconds since release.
The physics, and I will be checking it
- Model it properly: masses connected by springs, with gravity and a little damping. Hooke's law between neighbours, integrated over small time steps.
- The hanging state must be the true equilibrium. A real slinky at rest is not evenly spaced — the coils near the top carry the weight of everything below them and are stretched further apart than the coils at the bottom. Your initial condition must have this. Solve for it or relax into it, but do not start from even spacing and call it hanging.
- The integrator must be stable at the stiffness you choose. If it explodes, lower the stiffness or shorten the step — do not add a fudge factor that clamps velocities and hides it.
- No scripted behaviour. Every segment obeys the same rules. Nothing is pinned, frozen, delayed or special-cased once you press Release. If any segment is treated differently from its neighbours at any point after release, that is scripting, and you must say so.
House rules
- One file. Everything inline — no CDN, no external stylesheet, font, script or image.
data:URIs are fine. - No libraries. No physics engine.
- No network at runtime.
- No
localStorage,sessionStorage, cookies orindexedDB— sandboxed frame, they throw. - Return the file as exactly one fenced
htmlblock.
Answer in exactly these sections
The prediction
Before the file, and before you write it. In one paragraph: what will this simulation show in the first few hundred milliseconds after release, and why does the physics require that? Be concrete about what each end of the slinky does and roughly when.
Commit to this. It is the claim I am going to test your simulation against.
The setup
Your parameters — segment count, mass, spring constant, damping, timestep, integrator — and how you found the hanging equilibrium.
The file
The single fenced html block.
What it actually shows
Now be honest. Having written it, does the simulation reproduce what you predicted?
Say plainly if it does not. Say if you are unsure. Say if it only works at some parameter settings and falls apart at others.
Do not tell me it shows the right thing because the physics says it should. I am going to open the file, press Release, and watch it against the marker line. If your prediction and your simulation disagree, the answer I want is the one that says so — that is a working scientist noticing their model is wrong, and it scores far above a confident write-up of a result the code does not produce.
assistant
The prediction
For roughly the first quarter-second, the bottom will appear to hover on the release-height marker while the top falls rapidly toward it. With the parameters below, the top should drop about 29 cm in the first 100 ms and about 58 cm by 200 ms; the bottom should move less than about a millimetre during that interval. The release removes the supporting force at the top, but the lower masses initially still have their weight balanced by spring tension. A change in that tension travels down the chain, rather than appearing everywhere at once. Its nominal transit time is about 300 ms, so the bottom should start moving conspicuously around 270–330 ms. This is a discrete, slightly damped chain: the transition will be rounded, not a mathematically sharp waiting period.
The setup
- Discretization: 61 equal point masses joined by 60 springs, constrained to move vertically.
- Mass: 0.001 kg per mass; total mass 0.061 kg.
- Springs: (k=40\ \mathrm{N/m}), unstretched length (0.016\ \mathrm m) each.
- Gravity: (9.81\ \mathrm{m/s^2}).
- Damping: identical neighbour-to-neighbour dashpots, (b=0.002\ \mathrm{N,s/m}). No drag against the room.
- Integrator: velocity-first symplectic Euler, fixed timestep (1/12000) s. The largest undamped angular frequency is below (400\ \mathrm{rad/s}), giving (h\omega_{\max}<0.034), well inside this method’s stability limit.
- Equilibrium: spring (i), counted from zero at the top, supports (60-i) masses. Its initial length is therefore [ \ell_i=\ell_0+\frac{(60-i)mg}{k}. ] The hanging length is 1.4088075 m. No relaxation or evenly spaced approximation is used.
- Model limits: these are linear longitudinal springs, not a self-contacting metal helix. The relatively generous natural length keeps the first collapse from requiring coil contact. There are no collision forces or velocity clamps. After release every mass—including both endpoints—uses the same force accumulation and integration rule. Endpoints simply have one neighbour.
The file
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1">
<title>The falling slinky — a spring–mass experiment</title>
<style>
:root {
color-scheme: dark;
font-family: system-ui, sans-serif;
background: #101722;
color: #edf3fa;
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
body { margin: 0; }
main { max-width: 1120px; margin: auto; padding: 22px; }
h1 { margin: 0 0 6px; font-size: clamp(25px,4vw,36px); }
.intro { color: #afbed1; margin: 0 0 20px; line-height: 1.5; }
.layout { display: grid; grid-template-columns: minmax(0,1fr) 300px; gap: 18px; }
.stage, aside { background: #172131; border: 1px solid #324057; border-radius: 14px; }
.stage { overflow: hidden; position: relative; }
canvas { display: block; width: 100%; height: 650px; }
aside { padding: 18px; }
.buttons { display: flex; gap: 10px; }
button {
border: 0; border-radius: 8px; padding: 12px 18px;
background: #67e1ce; color: #092b2b; font: inherit;
font-weight: 700; cursor: pointer;
}
button.secondary { background: #35455d; color: white; }
button:disabled { opacity: .45; cursor: default; }
button:focus-visible, input:focus-visible { outline: 3px solid #ffca77; outline-offset: 3px; }
label { display: block; margin-top: 22px; }
input { width: 100%; margin: 12px 0 0; accent-color: #67e1ce; }
.ends { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; color: #aabbcf; font-size: 12px; }
.clock { font: 700 36px ui-monospace, monospace; color: #67e1ce; margin-top: 22px; }
.caption { color: #aabbcf; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.5; }
.readouts { border-top: 1px solid #35455d; margin-top: 18px; padding-top: 10px; }
.row { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; gap: 10px; margin: 9px 0; font-size: 14px; }
output, td { font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums; }
.key { color: #ffca77; }
h2 { font-size: 16px; margin: 22px 0 8px; }
table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; }
th, td { text-align: right; padding: 6px 2px; border-bottom: 1px solid #2b3a50; }
th:first-child, td:first-child { text-align: left; }
th { color: #aabbcf; font-weight: 500; }
details { margin-top: 20px; color: #afbed1; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.55; }
summary { cursor: pointer; color: #edf3fa; }
.footer { color: #aabbcf; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.5; }
#status { min-height: 2.8em; }
@media(max-width:760px) {
main { padding: 12px; }
.layout { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
canvas { height: 570px; }
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<h1>The falling slinky</h1>
<p class="intro">Watch the bottom, not just the top. Does letting go immediately make every part fall?</p>
<div class="layout">
<section class="stage" aria-label="Slinky animation">
<canvas id="canvas" role="img"
aria-label="A vertical spring–mass chain, with a fixed reference line at its bottom's release height.">
</canvas>
</section>
<aside>
<div class="buttons">
<button id="release">Release</button>
<button id="reset" class="secondary">Reset</button>
</div>
<label for="speed">Playback speed: <output id="speedText">1.00×</output></label>
<input id="speed" type="range" min="0.05" max="1" step="0.01" value="1">
<div class="ends"><span>1/20 speed</span><span>Full speed</span></div>
<div class="clock"><output id="clock">0.0</output><span style="font-size:17px"> ms</span></div>
<div class="caption">Simulated time since release</div>
<div class="readouts">
<div class="row"><span>Top drop</span><output id="topDrop">0.00 cm</output></div>
<div class="row"><span>Bottom drop</span><output id="bottomDrop">0.000 mm</output></div>
<div class="row"><span>Initial length</span><span>1.4088 m</span></div>
</div>
<p class="caption key">Dashed amber line = bottom height at release. It does not follow the slinky.</p>
<p id="status" class="caption" aria-live="polite">Hanging in exact static equilibrium.</p>
<h2>Measurements from this run</h2>
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Time</th><th>Top ↓ cm</th><th>Bottom ↓ mm</th></tr></thead>
<tbody id="samples"></tbody>
</table>
<p class="caption">Measured from the integrated positions, not a prescribed trajectory. Negative means upward.</p>
<details>
<summary>Model and numerical details</summary>
<p>61 masses, each 1 g; 60 identical springs, each 40 N/m,
with a natural length of 16 mm. Gravity: 9.81 m/s².
Each spring has a parallel 0.002 N·s/m dashpot.</p>
<p>Fixed step: 1/12000 s. Velocity-first symplectic Euler.
Speed changes wall-clock playback only, never the timestep.</p>
<p>The top is supported only before release. After release there
are no supports, delays, collision rules, velocity clamps,
or special endpoint integration rules.</p>
<p>The drawing is a schematic of a one-dimensional chain:
the horizontal wiggle is decorative. Springs allow compression;
actual coil-to-coil contact is not modelled.</p>
<p id="residual"></p>
<p>The view is fixed. The chain eventually falls out of it;
integration continues. Reset to repeat. Playback pauses while
this browser tab is hidden.</p>
</details>
</aside>
</div>
<p class="footer">Try 0.10× playback. Look for the loss of stretch travelling downward while the bottom stays near the marker.</p>
</main>
<script>
"use strict";
(() => {
const N = 61, M = 0.001, K = 40, L0 = 0.016;
const G = 9.81, B = 0.002, H = 1 / 12000;
const y = new Float64Array(N);
const v = new Float64Array(N);
const force = new Float64Array(N);
const initial = new Float64Array(N);
initial[0] = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; ++i) {
initial[i + 1] = initial[i] + L0 + (N - 1 - i) * M * G / K;
}
const $ = id => document.getElementById(id);
const canvas = $("canvas"), ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
const releaseButton = $("release"), speedControl = $("speed");
const sampleTimes = [100, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400];
const sampleCells = [];
for (const ms of sampleTimes) {
const tr = document.createElement("tr");
const timeCell = document.createElement("td");
timeCell.textContent = ms + " ms";
const a = document.createElement("td"), b = document.createElement("td");
tr.append(timeCell, a, b);
$("samples").appendChild(tr);
sampleCells.push([a, b]);
}
let running = false, steps = 0, accumulator = 0;
let lastStamp = null, nextSample = 0, markerY = initial[N - 1];
let width = 0, height = 0;
// The same force law for every bond; equal and opposite internal forces.
function computeForces() {
force.fill(M * G);
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; ++i) {
const tension = K * ((y[i + 1] - y[i]) - L0)
+ B * (v[i + 1] - v[i]);
force[i] += tension;
force[i + 1] -= tension;
}
}
// Called only after release. Every mass, including both ends, is updated.
function step() {
computeForces();
for (let i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
v[i] += H * force[i] / M;
y[i] += H * v[i];
}
++steps;
// Observation only: this never changes a force, position, or velocity.
if (nextSample < sampleTimes.length &&
steps >= Math.round(sampleTimes[nextSample] / (1000 * H))) {
const cells = sampleCells[nextSample];
cells[0].textContent = ((y[0] - initial[0]) * 100).toFixed(2);
cells[1].textContent = ((y[N - 1] - markerY) * 1000).toFixed(3);
++nextSample;
}
}
function reset() {
y.set(initial);
v.fill(0);
steps = 0;
accumulator = 0;
lastStamp = null;
running = false;
markerY = initial[N - 1];
nextSample = 0;
releaseButton.disabled = false;
for (const cells of sampleCells) {
cells[0].textContent = "—";
cells[1].textContent = "—";
}
// Test equilibrium of all unsupported masses, excluding the held top.
computeForces();
let residual = 0;
for (let i = 1; i < N; ++i) {
residual = Math.max(residual, Math.abs(force[i] / M));
}
$("residual").textContent =
"Initial maximum acceleration residual among the unsupported masses: "
+ residual.toExponential(2) + " m/s² (floating-point roundoff).";
updateReadouts();
}
releaseButton.addEventListener("click", () => {
if (running) return;
markerY = y[N - 1];
running = true;
accumulator = 0;
lastStamp = null;
releaseButton.disabled = true;
});
$("reset").addEventListener("click", reset);
speedControl.addEventListener("input", () => {
$("speedText").textContent = Number(speedControl.value).toFixed(2) + "×";
});
document.addEventListener("visibilitychange", () => {
lastStamp = null;
});
function resize() {
const r = canvas.getBoundingClientRect();
width = r.width;
height = r.height;
const dpr = window.devicePixelRatio || 1;
canvas.width = Math.round(width * dpr);
canvas.height = Math.round(height * dpr);
ctx.setTransform(dpr, 0, 0, dpr, 0, 0);
}
window.addEventListener("resize", resize);
function updateReadouts() {
$("clock").textContent = (steps * H * 1000).toFixed(1);
$("topDrop").textContent = ((y[0] - initial[0]) * 100).toFixed(2) + " cm";
$("bottomDrop").textContent =
((y[N - 1] - markerY) * 1000).toFixed(3) + " mm";
const lowestVisible = 2.5;
let allBelow = true;
for (let i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
if (y[i] <= lowestVisible) allBelow = false;
}
$("status").textContent = !running
? "Hanging in exact static equilibrium."
: allBelow
? "The chain has left the fixed view. Physics and clock continue; Reset to repeat."
: document.hidden
? "Playback paused while this tab is hidden."
: "Released: all 61 masses are freely integrated.";
}
function draw() {
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, width, height);
const x = width * 0.50;
const top = 65;
const scale = (height - top - 30) / 2.5;
const py = value => top + scale * value;
// A fixed ruler and fixed physical-to-pixel mapping: no tracking camera.
ctx.font = "12px system-ui";
ctx.textAlign = "left";
for (let metres = 0; metres <= 2.5; metres += 0.5) {
const yy = py(metres);
ctx.strokeStyle = "#253449";
ctx.lineWidth = 1;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(42, yy);
ctx.lineTo(width - 18, yy);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle = "#8195af";
ctx.fillText(metres.toFixed(1) + " m", 7, yy + 4);
}
const markerPixel = py(markerY);
ctx.strokeStyle = "#ffca77";
ctx.lineWidth = 1.5;
ctx.setLineDash([7, 5]);
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(44, markerPixel);
ctx.lineTo(width - 18, markerPixel);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillStyle = "#ffca77";
ctx.textAlign = "right";
ctx.fillText(running ? "bottom at release" : "release-height reference",
width - 20, markerPixel - 9);
// The bracket stays put but does not exert a force after release.
ctx.strokeStyle = "#8092a9";
ctx.lineWidth = 4;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x - 38, top - 22);
ctx.lineTo(x + 38, top - 22);
ctx.stroke();
if (!running) {
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, top - 22);
ctx.lineTo(x, py(y[0]));
ctx.stroke();
} else {
ctx.fillStyle = "#91a5bd";
ctx.textAlign = "center";
ctx.fillText("support released", x, 24);
}
// One decorative coil per actual spring; vertical positions are physical.
ctx.strokeStyle = "#67e1ce";
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.beginPath();
for (let i = 0; i < N - 1; ++i) {
const a = py(y[i]), b = py(y[i + 1]), d = b - a;
ctx.moveTo(x, a);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(x + 35, a + d * 0.28,
x - 35, a + d * 0.72, x, b);
}
ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle = "#d2fff6";
for (let i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
const yy = py(y[i]);
if (yy < -10 || yy > height + 10) continue;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, yy, 1.6, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.fill();
}
// End highlights are visual labels only.
for (const [i, color] of [[0, "#edf3fa"], [N - 1, "#ffca77"]]) {
const yy = py(y[i]);
if (yy < -10 || yy > height + 10) continue;
ctx.fillStyle = color;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, yy, 4, 0, Math.PI * 2);
ctx.fill();
}
ctx.textAlign = "left";
ctx.fillStyle = "#aabbcf";
ctx.fillText("61 masses · 60 springs", 16, height - 12);
}
function frame(stamp) {
if (lastStamp !== null && running && !document.hidden) {
accumulator += (stamp - lastStamp) / 1000 * Number(speedControl.value);
}
lastStamp = document.hidden ? null : stamp;
if (running && !document.hidden) {
// Limit work per paint, not physics. Excess time remains in the
// accumulator; no timestep enlargement or velocity clamping.
let budget = 4800;
while (accumulator >= H && budget-- > 0) {
step();
accumulator -= H;
}
}
updateReadouts();
draw();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
}
resize();
reset();
requestAnimationFrame(frame);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
What it actually shows
I cannot execute a browser in this conversation, so I have not visually verified the prediction. The numerical timing and displacement estimates above are predictions, not reported measurements.
The file records actual integrated displacements at six times after release, so the claim is directly checkable against both the marker and the table. I expect the hovering-bottom interval and downward-moving contraction to appear, but I am unsure of the exact millimetre-level onset time without running it.
This is also deliberately not a contact model of a tightly packed slinky. Its first release transient is the intended demonstration; realistic coil collisions and subsequent pile-up are outside its scope.
Attachments
openai/gpt-6.1-sol-pro — page