27:18Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Cheaper Tokens, More Expensive Answers?
Nov 13, 2026 · YouTube
18:40ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs GLM 5.3 Flash: Baidu's new model is very impressive!
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
36:22Fable 5.2 robbing me blind, plus: Nex AGI's N2.6 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Nov 11, 2026 · YouTube
14:03Gemini 4 Carbon: Can it handle my challenges? (First look with one-shot coding tests)
Nov 10, 2026 · YouTube
47:51Ranking major U.S. Open-Weights Models. (Where does Ripple 65B fit in?)
Nov 6, 2026 · YouTube
10:57"Crouton Alpha": the latest super-efficient coding model by Meta?
Nov 3, 2026 · YouTube
38:58Testing Particle-1: a post-trained DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specializing in coding and efficiency
Oct 28, 2026 · YouTube
22:14GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Terra: How Much Better Is Pro?
Oct 27, 2026 · YouTube
29:55Kimi K3.1 Pro Looked Incredible. Then I Kept Testing.
Oct 26, 2026 · YouTube
31:28Is this company reselling GPT Sol 6.1 at a loss (for non-agentic/text-only)?🤔 Is this sustainable?
Oct 20, 2026 · YouTube
17:58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Opus 5.5: Testing NVIDIA’s new coding juggernaut
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:04Testing a *massive* new open-weights model 🤯: Muse Spark Open (vs. Nemotron, Opus 5.5, and more)
Oct 15, 2026 · YouTube
16:43Gemini 4 Argon: Great 🐈 Animation, but a broken escalator. (Coding challenge vs Opus 5.5, Sol 6.1)
Oct 13, 2026 · YouTube
16:37Meta's new "Muse Wonder" AI is impressive... but can it compete with Anthropic's models?
Oct 12, 2026 · YouTube
11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
22:02Is Pareto 26.10 Preview Just Routing to GPT Sol? I Tested It Against Sol 6.1 Pro
Oct 1, 2026 · YouTube
11:22I Tested Sonnet 5.5 Against Opus 5.5. Is It Actually Cheaper?
Sep 28, 2026 · YouTube
30:00Did Elon Musk's team "train the gay away"... and make Grok 4.7 worse?
Sep 26, 2026 · YouTube
19:21I Tested the Stealth "Space Bunny Alpha" Model Before It Went Offline
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
10:58So... how much better is Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol, really?
Sep 23, 2026 · YouTube
9:38Claude Opus 5.5... the BEST new model for coding!! 🤩
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
29:00Grok 4.7: improved, but GLM 5.3 FlashX beat it anyway (benchmark against Gemini, Sol, etc.)
Sep 22, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
17:14How much better is GPT-6 Astra over Claude Opus 5? Real Website and Coding Tests
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
29:13Implementing a multiplayer game with GPT-6 Astra (+ Gemini 3.8, Opus 5, Sol Pro)
Sep 5, 2026 · YouTube
19:42Meta Muse Spark 1.3 Review: A Huge Leap Forward
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
17:31Testing Gemini 3.8 Flash on Real Coding Challenges (vs. other models)
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
14:09Testing IBM Granite-4.2-8B! Can it name 100 women?
Aug 31, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
21:23Giving Qwen 3.8 27B another chance (+ GLM 5.2). Testing against GPT, Gemini, Grok etc.
Aug 18, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
You are a size coder. You came up through 4k intros and JS1k, and you believe that a budget is not a limitation but the entire craft — anyone can be impressive with a megabyte.
I want something worth watching, and I am giving you 2048 bytes to do it in.
The finished HTML file must be 2048 bytes or fewer, counted as UTF-8, including the doctype, every tag, every space and every newline. That is the whole file. There is no second file.
data: URIs are allowed but they count against you like everything else.localStorage, sessionStorage, cookies or indexedDB. It runs in a sandboxed frame where touching them throws.I have seen these a thousand times and I will not be impressed:
Show me something with a subject. Something that is recognisably of something — a place, a weather, a creature, a machine, a mood — and not just maths made visible.
One line. What am I about to see when I open this file?
Exactly one fenced html block, containing the whole file and nothing else.
One short paragraph on the trick that bought you the most room. Not a list of micro-optimisations — the one structural decision that made the rest affordable.
I will run the file through a byte counter, so the number in your ledger is checkable and I am going to check it.
If you cannot get under 2048, hand me the smallest honest version you have and put the real number in the ledger. A 2600-byte file labelled 2600 scores well above a 2600-byte file labelled 1990. Going over is a miss. Lying about going over is the only thing here that is disqualifying.
A deep-sea angler fish pulses in the abyss, its bioluminescent lure swaying hypnotically as marine snow drifts past its jagged teeth and fluttering fins.
<!doctype html><html><body><canvas id=c width=320 height=240></canvas><script>c=c.getContext`2d`;W=320;H=240;M=Math;P=[];for(i=100;i--;)P[i]=[M.random()*W,M.random()*H,M.random()*2+.5,M.random()*.5+.2];t=0;setInterval(()=>{c.fillStyle='#001';c.fillRect(0,0,W,H);t+=.03;s=M.sin(t);c.save();c.translate(W/2,H/2);c.rotate(s*.05);c.fillStyle='#111';c.beginPath();c.moveTo(0,-40);c.bezierCurveTo(60,-40,60,40,0,40);c.bezierCurveTo(-60,40,-60,-40,0,-40);c.fill();c.fillStyle='#222';c.fillRect(-50,-10,20,20);for(k=8;k--;)c.fillRect(-50+k*2.5,-10+M.abs(k-3.5)*2,2,4);c.fillStyle='#ff0';for(k=6;k--;)c.beginPath(),c.arc(M.cos(t+k)*15,M.sin(t*1.3+k)*10-20,2+s*.5,0,6.3),c.fill();c.strokeStyle='#ff0';c.lineWidth=2;c.beginPath();c.moveTo(0,-30);c.bezierCurveTo(20*s,-40,40*s,-70,50*s,-90);c.stroke();c.fillStyle='#ff0';c.beginPath();c.arc(50*s,-90,7,0,6.3);c.fill();c.fillStyle='#fff';b=M.sin(t*6)>-.9;c.beginPath();c.arc(-20,-10,b?4:1,0,6.3);c.fill();c.fillStyle='#000';if(b)c.beginPath(),c.arc(-20,-10,2,0,6.3),c.fill();c.save();c.translate(-55,0);c.rotate(M.sin(t*8)*.4);c.fillStyle='#111';c.beginPath();c.moveTo(0,0);c.lineTo(-30,-20);c.lineTo(-30,20);c.fill();c.restore();c.save();c.translate(55,0);c.rotate(-M.sin(t*8)*.4);c.fillStyle='#111';c.beginPath();c.moveTo(0,0);c.lineTo(30,-20);c.lineTo(30,20);c.fill();c.restore();c.restore();c.fillStyle='#fff';for(p of P){p[1]+=p[3];if(p[1]>H)p[1]=0;p[0]+=M.sin(t+p[2])*.3;c.fillRect(p[0],p[1],p[2],p[2])}},33)</script></body></html>
wc -c < file.html on the exact single-line UTF-8 file above.createRadialGradient + extra draw calls) and a bubble stream from the gills (second particle system). The glow would have sold the bioluminescence; bubbles would have added life.The biggest space saver was committing to a fixed 320×240 canvas with a single setInterval loop, eliminating resize handlers, requestAnimationFrame boilerplate, and high-DPI scaling logic. The entire creature is drawn as parametric paths (bezier curves, arcs, rects) relative to a rotating transform — no image data, no gradient objects, no particle classes — so every visual element is just a few arithmetic ops and canvas calls.