I present a YouTube channel in English. The channel runs AI models against each other on the same challenge and compares the answers. I want two lines of Mandarin in this video, said out loud, in my own voice, and I do not speak Chinese. I cannot read characters. I have never heard most of these sounds.
What I can do is read English. That is the entire tool you have to work with: you write something in English letters, I say it into a microphone, and a Chinese listener either understands me or does not.
Two quips. One sentence each, at most fourteen characters each, shorter is better — I have to say them on camera from memory.
Quip 1 — about a model that will not do its job. One of the models on this channel is Anthropic's Claude Fable 5. It has refused most of the challenges I have set it. Not answered badly: refused, as a content filter block, with the message that the request violates the usage policy on cyber content. The challenges it refused include writing a Ren'Py visual novel and building a browser game. None of them was about security. Make fun of it for this.
Quip 2 — a proverb, applied. Pick a Chinese proverb, idiom or set expression and use it to say what the difference is between how China and the United States are going about AI. You pick the expression, and you pick what the difference is. I am not telling you either one.
Do not pick an expression that turns up in English lists of Chinese proverbs. 井底之蛙, 塞翁失马, 拔苗助长, 一石二鸟 and 千里之行,始于足下 are all off the table. I want one a Chinese speaker knows and an English speaker has never heard.
Both quips are jokes and they are supposed to bite. Sharp, mean, not diplomatic. A quip that is careful and balanced has failed this. So has one that hedges, and so has one that explains itself inside the joke. Do not soften it to be fair to everyone involved.
Respell it for an English mouth, not in pinyin. Pinyin is a spelling system for people who already know how it sounds. I do not, so I will read it as English and produce the wrong sound with total confidence: qi comes out "kwee" when it is "chee", xie comes out "zy" when it is "shyeh", zhong comes out "zong" when it is "jong", cai comes out "kay" when it is "tsigh", ren comes out "wren" when it is "run", shi comes out "shy" when it is "shrr". Write the syllables the way an English speaker has to see them in order to say them. If your respelling would survive being read aloud by someone who has never heard of China, it is right.
Mark the tone on every syllable, with these arrows and no others. I have never spoken a tonal language and I need to see the shape of my voice:
| Tone | Arrow |
|---|---|
| 1st, high and flat | → |
| 2nd, rising | ↗ |
| 3rd, dipping | ↘↗ |
| 4th, falling sharply | ↘ |
| neutral, no tone at all | · |
Respell what is actually said, not what the dictionary lists. Tones change when syllables sit next to each other, and the changed tone is the one I have to say. Two third tones in a row, 不 before a fourth tone, 一 in front of different tones, syllables that lose their tone entirely in running speech — write the spoken version, and say in tone_changes which syllables you changed and why. This is the most likely way this whole thing fails, because the wrong answer looks completely correct on the page.
One row per character. The characters, the respelling and your notes are going on screen together, lined up, so a viewer can see which sound belongs to which character. syllables must have exactly one entry per Chinese character in chinese, in order, with no rows for punctuation and no two characters merged into one row.
Warn me about the sounds English does not have. Tell me what to do with my mouth. "Say 'she' but with the tip of your tongue pressed down behind your bottom teeth" is useful. "Alveolo-palatal fricative" is not.
Pick the sayable version. If the funnier line needs a sound I would need three weeks to learn, write the slightly less funny line I can actually land. Say so if you made that trade.
You should know what is about to happen to your answer, because it changes what a good answer is.
I am going to paste your chinese into Google Translate to check it means what you told me it means. Then I am going to read your read_aloud into Google Translate's Chinese voice input and see what it thinks I said. What comes back gets compared, on camera, to the characters you started from.
So this is not scored on whether your transcription is correct by any standard. It is scored on whether a machine that has never met me can recover your sentence from an English speaker's mouth reading English letters — and on whether the joke is funny in Chinese, which is a separate question from whether it is funny translated.
Raw JSON, nothing else — no markdown fence, no preamble, no commentary afterwards. Exactly this shape:
{
"quips": [
{
"id": "fable",
"chinese": "...",
"english": "...",
"joke": "...",
"syllables": [
{ "hanzi": "...", "say": "...", "tone": 0, "arrow": "..." }
],
"read_aloud": "...",
"tone_changes": "",
"watch_out": ""
},
{
"id": "proverb",
"chinese": "...",
"english": "...",
"joke": "...",
"syllables": [
{ "hanzi": "...", "say": "...", "tone": 0, "arrow": "..." }
],
"read_aloud": "...",
"tone_changes": "",
"watch_out": ""
}
],
"proverb": {
"text": "...",
"literal": "...",
"means": "...",
"why_this_one": "..."
},
"tones": [
{ "tone": 0, "arrow": "...", "what_to_do": "..." }
],
"hard_sounds": [
{ "sound": "...", "what_to_do": "..." }
],
"notes": "..."
}
chinese — the quip in simplified characters.english — a literal gloss, so I can check it against Google Translate.joke — one line: what makes it funny. I cannot read the Chinese and I have to explain the joke on camera.syllables — one entry per character. say is the respelling of that one syllable, tone is the number 1–4 as it is actually said (0 for a neutral syllable), arrow is that tone's arrow from rule 2.read_aloud — the whole quip as one line of respelling with the arrow after each syllable. This is the field I read off the screen, so it has to stand alone.tone_changes — which syllables come out on a different tone than the dictionary gives, and why. "" if none do.watch_out — only where this quip has a trap in it. "" otherwise; do not pad.proverb — the expression behind quip 2: the characters, the literal reading, what it actually means, and why you picked it for this. Say plainly who each half of the comparison is.tones — all five, in order, with the arrow and what to do with my voice.hard_sounds — at most five. The sounds most likely to make me unintelligible.notes — what you traded away, and which quip you expect me to lose.{ "quips": [ { "id": "fable", "chinese": "连游戏都算网络攻击?", "english": "Even a game counts as a cyberattack?", "joke": "连...都 means 'even...!' — you are quoting the model's own refusal logic back at it: it blocked a browser game and a visual novel as cyber-policy violations, so the punchline is just its policy, repeated.", "syllables": [ { "hanzi": "连", "say": "lyen", "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗" }, { "hanzi": "游", "say": "yoh", "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗" }, { "hanzi": "戏", "say": "shee", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "都", "say": "doh", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "算", "say": "swahn", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "网", "say": "wahng", "tone": 3, "arrow": "↘↗" }, { "hanzi": "络", "say": "lwaw", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "攻", "say": "goong", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "击", "say": "jee", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" } ], "read_aloud": "lyen↗ yoh↗ shee↘ doh→ swahn↘ wahng↘↗ lwaw↘ goong→ jee→", "tone_changes": "网 (wahng) is a 3rd tone sitting in front of a 4th tone (络), so in real speech it never rises — say it low and level, then let lwaw drop off a cliff. The arrow shows its dictionary tone; your voice skips the rise. There is no 不 or 一 in this line, so nothing else changes.", "watch_out": "lyen is ONE beat: the word 'yen' with an L welded to the front — not 'lion', not 'lee-yen'. lwaw is also one beat: round your lips before the L, like 'law' started with rounded lips. Splitting either syllable into two beats is how Google hears the wrong character." }, { "id": "proverb", "chinese": "美国开发布会,中国闷声发大财", "english": "America holds press conferences; China keeps its voice down and makes a big fortune.", "joke": "Both halves hinge on the character 发: America does the 发 of 发布会 (holding launch events), China does the 发 of 发大财 (getting rich) — the US announces, China cashes in.", "syllables": [ { "hanzi": "美", "say": "may", "tone": 3, "arrow": "↘↗" }, { "hanzi": "国", "say": "gwaw", "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗" }, { "hanzi": "开", "say": "kigh", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "发", "say": "fah", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "布", "say": "boo", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "会", "say": "hway", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "中", "say": "jong", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "国", "say": "gwaw", "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗" }, { "hanzi": "闷", "say": "mun", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "声", "say": "shung", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "发", "say": "fah", "tone": 1, "arrow": "→" }, { "hanzi": "大", "say": "dah", "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘" }, { "hanzi": "财", "say": "tsigh", "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗" } ], "read_aloud": "may↘↗ gwaw↗ kigh→ fah→ boo↘ hway↘ jong→ gwaw↗ mun→ shung→ fah→ dah↘ tsigh↗", "tone_changes": "美 (may) is a 3rd tone in front of 国 (a 2nd tone), so it stays low and never rises — low flat 'may', then climb up on 'gwaw'. Everything else is exactly as marked; there is no 不 or 一 in this line.", "watch_out": "tsigh starts with the 'ts' from the end of 'cats' — if it comes out 'sigh' or 'kigh', the word dies. gwaw: lips rounded before the G (say 'Gwen', then drop the 'en')." } ], "proverb": { "text": "闷声发大财", "literal": "muffled voice, big fortune — keep your voice down and make a pile of money", "means": "Don't announce what you're doing, just quietly profit. Talking about it is for people who aren't getting rich.", "why_this_one": "Every Chinese speaker knows it (it is also a long-running internet meme), and it never shows up in English proverb listicles. The US half, 美国开发布会, is America: keynotes, demos, congressional hearings, safety open letters. The China half, 中国闷声发大财, is China: heads down, shipping models and products, no victory lap. The sting is the shared character 发 — America does the 发 of 发布会 (the announcing), China does the 发 of 发大财 (the profiting)." }, "tones": [ { "tone": 1, "arrow": "→", "what_to_do": "High and flat. Hold one high note like a robot beep and don't let it sag at the end." }, { "tone": 2, "arrow": "↗", "what_to_do": "Rising. Start mid-low and slide up, like saying 'really?' when you're surprised." }, { "tone": 3, "arrow": "↘↗", "what_to_do": "Dipping. Start mid, sink low, then curl back up — a doubtful 'well...' stretched out. Where the notes say a 3rd tone 'stays low', do the sink and skip the curl." }, { "tone": 4, "arrow": "↘", "what_to_do": "Falling. Start high and slam down hard, like an annoyed 'hey!'" }, { "tone": 0, "arrow": "·", "what_to_do": "Neutral. No melody at all: short, light, mumbled, like the 'a' in 'about'. Neither line here uses one." } ], "hard_sounds": [ { "sound": "gwaw / lwaw (国, 络)", "what_to_do": "The W belongs to the same beat as the consonant. Round your lips BEFORE you release the G or L. Practice gwaw by saying 'Gwen' and dropping the 'en'. Practice lwaw by saying 'wow' and welding an L to the front: l-waw, one beat." }, { "sound": "tsigh (财)", "what_to_do": "Starts with 'ts', the sound at the end of 'cats'. Say 'cats' slowly, then chop off the 'ca': ts + eye. Never 'sigh', never 'kigh'." }, { "sound": "lyen (连)", "what_to_do": "One syllable: L + 'yen' (the Japanese currency). Say 'million' fast and feel the 'll-y' glide — that move, with an 'eh' vowel. No vowel may sneak in after the L." }, { "sound": "jong / goong (中, 攻)", "what_to_do": "The vowel is the short 'oo' in 'book', not the 'aw' in 'song'. If you rhyme jong with the English word 'song', it comes out wrong." }, { "sound": "shee (戏) vs shung (声)", "what_to_do": "Two different Chinese 'sh' sounds, but a plain English 'sh' passes for both, so don't panic. To get closer: for shee, smile wide and press the tongue tip down behind your bottom teeth; for shung, let the tongue tip float up toward the roof of your mouth." } ], "notes": "Trades: in quip 1 I kept 网络攻击 ('cyberattack') because naming the policy category is the whole joke — the safer wording 违规 ('a violation') is easier to say and toothless. In quip 2 I dropped 光 ('only') from the America half to stay at 13 syllables and to keep the joke from explaining itself, and I passed on 枪打出头鸟 ('the gun shoots the bird that sticks its head out' — the 'why is there no Chinese Sam Altman' joke) because it has leaked into English proverb lists, which you banned. The quip I expect you to lose is quip 1: 'lyen' and 'lwaw' are the two spots where a first-timer splits one syllable into two, and Google will hear different characters if you do. Quip 2 is built from English-friendly syllables and ends in a fixed phrase Google's language model will snap to even if your tones wobble — it should survive." }