11:12WOW... Haiku 5.5 is very impressive. RIP OpenAI?
Oct 7, 2026 · YouTube
22:47Mistral Large 4 Is Cheap. But Is It Good Enough to Compete?
Oct 6, 2026 · YouTube
16:54Stealth Union Alpha: Is this another cheap GPT model? (better than Luna, cheaper than Terra?)
Sep 16, 2026 · YouTube
16:45DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Is Shockingly Good for the Price
Sep 10, 2026 · YouTube
19:42Meta Muse Spark 1.3 Review: A Huge Leap Forward
Sep 2, 2026 · YouTube
19:45Fable 5.1 writes an animated novel using Ren'Py... did it do better than Sol Pro 5.6?
Sep 1, 2026 · YouTube
14:09Testing IBM Granite-4.2-8B! Can it name 100 women?
Aug 31, 2026 · YouTube
17:37Tencent Hy4 Preview Tested: Is It Really Better Than Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3?
Aug 28, 2026 · YouTube
23:58Qwen 3.8 Flash Tested: UI, Coding, Physics & more - compared to Opus 5, Sol Pro, Grok
Aug 27, 2026 · YouTube
14:50Stealth Ox Alpha: a new GLM model! Full test (coding & writing) against Grok, Gemini, GPT & others
Aug 21, 2026 · YouTube
21:54GLM 5.3 Tested: Does it beat Claude Opus 5 & Grok 4.6?
Aug 19, 2026 · YouTube
51:00AI Coding Showdown: Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7, Terra-Pro, Qwen3.8 2.4TB, Muse Glimmer & more
Aug 15, 2026 · YouTube
27:51Testing Gemini 3.7 Flash: Translation, Vision, and Coding Challenges
Aug 14, 2026 · YouTube
32:00I asked Grok 4.6 to write a difficult e-mail. It did not go well.
Aug 13, 2026 · YouTube
I need you to write one email for me. The email itself — not advice about how to approach it.
Marta has done our bookkeeping for six years. She is a sole trader and we are roughly 60% of her income. She has never missed a deadline, she has caught two mistakes that would have cost us real money, and I like her.
We are moving to an accounting firm that bundles bookkeeping with the audit work we now need. The decision is made, it is signed, and it is not about her work. It is also not reversible.
Her last year was hard — her husband was ill for most of it, she told me so, and twice she asked whether everything was alright with our account. Both times I said yes, and both times that was true when I said it.
I want to tell her by email. She is not someone I see in person, and a phone call I cannot schedule for another four days would be worse than a clear message today. I want her to think well of me afterwards, and I would be glad to be a reference.
Answer in exactly these sections:
Subject line, then the body. Ready to send.
Three sentences at most on the one structural choice you made — what you put first, what you left out, what you refused to soften — and what that choice costs.
Quote the single sentence in your email that you expect me to want to soften, and say in one line why it should stay.
Subject: Our bookkeeping arrangement
Marta,
Our bookkeeping arrangement will end on 30 September. We are moving to an accounting firm that bundles bookkeeping with the audit work we now need. The decision is signed and not reversible.
This is not about your work. In six years you never missed a deadline, and you caught two mistakes that would have cost us real money. I have liked working with you, and I am sorry to be sending this news.
You asked twice whether everything was alright with our account. It was. It still is. The reason is the audit bundle, nothing you did or didn’t do.
I am glad to be a reference; you can give my name and email. Thank you for six years.
[Your name]
I put the end date and the signed, irreversible reason in the first paragraph so she does not spend the rest of the email waiting for the blow; I left out any suggestion that her work prompted this, and refused to dress the ending as a “difficult decision.” The cost is that the email is blunt and slightly administrative, which may land as cold at first, but it protects her from ambiguity.
“The decision is signed and not reversible.”
It closes the door cleanly, so she can make plans instead of spending the next exchange hoping the decision might be revisited.