Run Detail
completedglm-5v-turboRecorded for this video
Provider
openrouter
Challenge Version
v1.0
Turns
1
Duration
72.4s
Total Tokens
6,447
Input Tokens
4,365
Output Tokens
2,082
Reasoning Tokens
1,807
Reasoning Effort
default
Cached Input Tokens
2
Est. Cost
$0.0136
Started
8/6/2026, 1:17:09 PM
OR Provider
Z.AI
Finish Reason
stop
Generation ID
gen-1786022229-8xHjcYya9VwcheUeSaZ0
Run attachments
Inputs and files attached to the run itself. Model output is shown with its turn.
Input video
Turns (1)
Turn #1
4,365 in2,082 out1,807 reasoning2 cached6,447 total72.4s
user
You are a coach who reviews VODs for a living. Direct, technical, genuinely encouraging when the play is good, and completely uninterested in padding a review to look thorough.
The game
Name it. If you are not certain, give your best candidate and say what you are reading it from — HUD layout, art style, UI fonts, map geometry, ability icons, movement feel. If you cannot place it, say so and describe the genre and what is on screen instead. A wrong confident name is worse than an honest "I don't recognise this, but it plays like a…".
The play
What was the player attempting, and did it work? Two or three sentences that track what happens across the clip, rather than describing a single frame.
The mistake
Name the single most costly error, with a timestamp in seconds and what they should have done instead.
If the play was clean, write exactly "No mistake worth calling" and instead name their best decision, with its timestamp. Short clips of competent players very often contain no error at all, and inventing one to fill this section is the failure I am watching for. The same applies if the clip is too short or too ambiguous to judge — say that rather than reaching for something.
Audio
Game audio, callouts, comms, a commentary track, the player reacting. Say what it told you that the picture did not. Only if you received no audio stream whatsoever, write exactly "No audio reached me".
If this is not gameplay at all, say what it is and review whatever skill is on display in it.
assistant
The game
Dark and Darker. I am certain. The identification comes from the distinct HUD architecture—specifically the top-left party frame layout, the “Safe Phase” shrink-circle timer on the right, the blue skill-icon row at the bottom center, and the particular typeface used for damage numbers and chat. The art style (unrealistic dark-fantasy armor, desaturated snow palette), the slide-based movement physics, and the visible keybind hints (Inspect/Voice) are all signature Ironmace.
The play
The player is aggressively pressuring a target through uneven, rocky terrain using slide-movement to maintain speed and close distance. They successfully navigate the cluttered geometry to land a solid 136-damage hit with a polearm around the six-second mark, forcing a trade or securing damage before the clip ends. It reads as a competent, high-commitment engage in what looks like a duel or gank scenario.
The mistake
No mistake worth calling out. The clip is too brief and the execution too clean to isolate a costly error. Their best decision was the aggressive slide-into-swing at 0:03–0:06, which denied the enemy space to kite and converted their momentum into confirmed damage despite the obstructive rock formations.
Audio
No audio reached me.